The truth about HDV Keying

Ben1000 wrote on 3/11/2006, 3:56 PM
**Sorry about the weird links. Not sure if you can imbed stuff on this forum, but hopefully you can figure it out...***

Howdy...

I'd read many topics about using HDV for keying, and how terrible it is due to the MPEG compression and such. I decided to do a few tests... Here are the results...

I shot some quick and dirty footage (didn't white balance, didn't light the scenes with much care, etc...) The scenes were shot indoors with a flexi-screen. Twin flourescent lights lit up the screen, while I was lit with fairly rudimentary 3-point lighting with three softboxes.

I shot basically the same thing first with my Sony DSR-390, and then again with my Sony Z1, in HDV mode. Most settings were on auto on both cameras.

The screen basically looked like this:

[IMG]http://www.rooproductions.com/keytest/grnscrn2.jpg[/IMG]

First I shot with the DSR, captured with DVRACK, and took it straight into Serious Magic Ultra to key. This is the only app I key with generally. The results looked pretty good for 20mins worth of work:

[IMG]http://www.rooproductions.com/keytest/dvkey1.jpg[/IMG]

Then I shot the same thing again with the Z1, captured to HDVRack, compressed with Cineform, imported into Vegas, and shrunk to DV Spec, rendered and brought it into Ultra. I found this key to be just as easy to work with as the DV key. Probably should have white balanced, but I was in a hurry...:-)...

[IMG]http://www.rooproductions.com/keytest/hdvkey1.jpg[/IMG]

Finally, I took the same footage and blew it up 200% in Vegas before rendering, too see if I could get a '2nd camera' close up from the original HDV footage:

[IMG]http://www.rooproductions.com/keytest/hdvkey2.jpg[/IMG]

My conclusions? HDV keys just fine, thanks very much. With these quick and dirty settings, I was able to get very acceptable keys. Much of what I do these days is delivered via flash for internet delivery, and I think the quality of these keys is quite acceptable for that. With more time and care, even better keys could be produced...

If you're intersted in seeing the actual footage, you can find it here:

[URL=http://www.rooproductions.com/keytest]Ben's HDV Keying Test[/URL]

I hope this helps folks who are worried about keying wiht HDV. I now feel that the HDV format is just fine for creating acceptable keys, at least with Serious Magic Ultra.

Best,

Ben

Comments

johnmeyer wrote on 3/11/2006, 5:02 PM
I don't key much, but I thought HDV was better, because of it's "better" color space (compare to DV). Yes? No?
Spot|DSE wrote on 3/11/2006, 5:07 PM
HDV is just fine for keying with anything, Vegas included.
I believe the mythology of key inability with HDV is founded around two points;
1. Anti HDV folks looking for whatever they can get their mitts on to challenge the format.
2. A misunderstanding of the 4:2:0 colorspace, equating it to the same issues as DV 4:2:0, which samples differently. The samples aren't the same in MPEG 2 as they are in PAL/576 DV.
farss wrote on 3/11/2006, 5:19 PM
Add to that, if you're working in SD you can downsample HDV to get 4:2:2 which will key way better than PAL DV at 4:2:0.
We've got the HD Connect LE running now, need to get our DB deck back online to truly try it out but on a SDI monitor the 16:9 SD looks glorious.
I don't know how the HD Connect stacks up against using Vegas for the downsample but they're doing it in 14bit so I suspect it's going to be even better. I'm not certain if they're outputing 8 or 10 bit, I think we have to wait for the full blown HD Connect to get 10 bit.

And just a little note to my compatriots in the USA, some people do use 16:9 SD, that wasn't an option on that little blue box initially. We set 'em straight and it now works fine.

Bob.