Comments

rustier wrote on 7/24/2007, 11:15 PM
Since you used the term stretch I am assuming you mean take an ordinary standard 4:3 source and stretch it out on a wide screen tv (Hi Def) geared for 480, 720, or 1080 - yes? If that is what you were refering to I would have to say I prefer side box. Stretching distorts the view and makes things look unnatural - especially peoples heads IMHO. On older sets stretching can contribute to ghosting and other artifacts. If you have a wide screen dvd and play it on an older standard 4:3 tv that has the stretch function I would say the picture might not look that much different, but that depends on the tv. I would stick with the letterbox. Now if you send a standard signal through many Hi Def TV's they choke on it and the picture looks terrible if they dont have a built in scaler.

And if you are talking about rendering - well I would say render to suite the final user: little tv, big tv, computer, internet, big screen. You will have a quality product when they are matched properly.
Ivan Lietaert wrote on 7/25/2007, 12:21 AM
I'm actually talking about the non-HD, 16:9 format. When I render in 'letterbox', there is a black band on top and bottom. When I render and tick off "stretch (do not letterbox), those black bands are gone.
When I play these two on my 16:9 television, there is a difference: for the one, I must put the tv in 16:9 mode, for the other it must be 'widescreen mode'. There is no deformation in either.
To further complicate matters (for me, that is), DVDA templates are in 16:9.
So basically, I'd like to avoid having to manually adjust tv mode when going from a dvd menu to a movie.
Eugenia wrote on 7/25/2007, 1:19 AM
If your TV is widescreen, export in a 16:9 format without letterboxing.