Update on recording wirelessly

Sijon wrote on 9/8/2006, 9:19 AM
Wireless Audio Recording on location / Wireless Recording / Recording Audio Wirelessly



This paper describes a system to record multiple tracks of 24 bit audio at up to and including 192 KHz sampling rates using off-the-shelf 802.11G components. This system has been in use for over a year and, compared to systems using audio “snakes,” proven itself to be an enormous set up time saver, provide cleaner more transparent audio, and be down-right fun to use.



After 20 years of recording to Ampex 351s, AG-440s, MR-70s, MM-1100s, Revox A77s, and the Braun tape recorder (the first transport with full logic controls), I began recording to computer in 1991 using an 8 microphone input Yamaha mixer that output to a Turtle Beach 56K interface. The computer was an IBM 286 with a $2000, 1.5 GB Maxtor SCSI I hard drive (that failed after a year, by the way. Maxtor wouldn’t look at it; said it was junk to begin with). Turtle Beach was bought out by a company interested only in selling to gamers and other consumer interests and their professional product fell by the wayside. One valiant programmer posted drivers for the new Windows 95 operating system but they were buggy and of little use. I shifted to a new shareware program called Sound Forge that proved extremely stable and reliable. Over the next few years I switched to Mackie mixers and Lynx and then M-Audio Delta 1010 interfaces. I was locked into a thought pattern that said you use microphones that output to a snake that input to a manual mixer to a set of headphones or monitors and “that’s the way you do it.”



My engineer son, Peter, in the late 90’s began to ask me if I wouldn’t like to have a system where I didn’t have wire strung everywhere and that allowed me to sit anywhere in the audience instead of outside in a truck or backstage or even another room. I told him that would be great but I couldn’t see how that could work. He suggested I get a copy of PCAnywhere and experiment. There was just no way that would work! But, I did begin to think outside the box! Then in 2005 it suddenly became possible.



By this time Peter was a Senior Scientist for Titan (L3) and had moved to Maryland. He provided the concepts while I made them work. I purchased my first laptop using an Intel M processor (They were too mickey-mouse up to this point) and decided after some experimentation that this thing could be used for serious location recording work. The real break-through came when MOTU introduced the Traveler. This unit had microphone pre-amps, converters, amplifiers in a 1U package. But the important feature was that the microphone pre-amps were VCAs and software controllable! Amazingly MOTU doesn’t even mention this in their advertising but it’s what sets their unit apart from Mackie, M-Audio, Pre-Sonus and others. I found out about it by talking with the guys that design and manufacture the MOTU gear. Aphex does make a mixer with VCAs but it’s only a mixer whereas the MOTU has converters – everything needed for recording. Meanwhile, over in Maryland, Peter was using Windows XP’s Remote Desktop extensively at this point and conceptually put the whole thing together, even suggesting the supporting equipment.



The dirty little secret is that it’s not necessary to record wirelessly. It’s only necessary to control wirelessly! And this is very feasible using Remote Desktop. To give you an idea of what’s involved: I have an 8 space SKB portable rack that I place at the front of a concert hall (or school, church, etc.). It contains, top to bottom, a Furman Line Filter with LED lamps, a 1U chassis with an AES M/S Decoder and Ramsey FM transmitter, two MOTU Travelers, a Marantz PMD 570 (for backup and also has transport controls that are remote controlled), an IBM Netvista computer, and, finally, a 1U power supply chassis (home-brew), that replaces all the wall-warts and contains an Ethernet to serial converter. The rear cover for the SKB rack contains a velcro strap to retain a Linksys WR54TGS 802.11G Router with four way Ethernet switch. Short cable runs from the microphones to the Travelers keep phase shifts and band-pass filtering effects from distorting the audio yielding a sound with greater depth and transparency. The router is placed on top of the rack and connected to the Ethernet connection on the computer and the Ethernet to serial converter that goes to the Marantz PMD-570. This little DHCP network is MAC filtered to allow only the MAC addresses for the converter, IBM computer and my laptop. The IBM goes into hibernation each time it is turned off so no keyboard, mouse, or screen is necessary after the initial setup. I take my laptop, go sit anywhere in the auditorium, and connect wirelessly to my little network.



After executing Remote Desktop, the desktop on the IBM comes up on my laptop and I execute the MOTU CueMix virtual mixer. This gives me full control of the microphone levels, pan, pads, etc in 1 dB steps. I actually have more and better control over my setups than ever before. I know exactly where each mike is set and it’s all there on the screen in front of me. (These setups can be memorized and saved, by the way.) Then I execute the recording program and set it up for the job. Finally, I bring up the transport controls to the PMD-570 backup recorder. It uses one of the four mixes from the MOTU virtual mixer and is capable of only two tracks. One of the other mixes feeds the Ramsey FM transmitter which allows me to monitor anything and everything using a Sony Walkman radio with headphones. While Remote Desktop does have an audio return it is not of sufficient quality to do serious work. This will require 64 bit Windows and the new 802.11n draft systems. (They’re called draft systems because a standard has not been determined at the time this was written. See Addendum below for update on this matter) Other outputs from the mixer allow playback in a recording session or other applications such as a sound system feed or feed to a videographer.



The entire rack, with everything running, consumes about 150 watts. With my Galaxy Far Outlet 300 supply + 100 Amp deep discharge battery I can record for about 3.75 hours. The Far Outlet enables operation from 11-15 VDC or 85 to 260 VAC, 50 or 60 cycle, which is very handy for recording outside the US. Some have asked if I use a UPS. No, I don't because I've found the UPS to be less reliable than the AC mains in the US. However, the Furman filter is extremely valuable. I can think of a church in Little Rock that shut me down twice when the AC came on. The Furman takes out that huge spike and eliminates the problem.



It all works wonderfully and reliably giving me more versatility than I ever dreamed of. I can even check microphones now without having someone tap the stand. I can record using only the IBM. I can still connect using a snake. I can still record from the truck. I can record using the laptop with a 6 foot Firewire cable connecting me to the rack so the recording is actually to the laptop drive. I can record using a length of Ethernet patch cable to connect the laptop and the rack system. Or, I can record wirelessly. The options are many and allow me great freedom in the over 200 location recordings I do in a year. I save hours of setup time or worrying about where to place cables so concert-goers won’t trip over them.



Conceptually, it’s simple enough. The devil is in the details. Even the recording software enters the picture. For example: I love the Sonic Foundry/SONY software and use it for all my work. However, it has a fatal flaw in that the transport controls are not correctly written. If you know anything about RF you know that it is impossible to maintain a 100% reliable path, especially when you’re dealing with digital devices. The digital boys know little about RF and it shows. This means that 802.11x transmissions dropout often just as does a cell phone. When this happens the SONY software also drops out of record and, bingo, you’ve lost the job. I tested many other recording packages before settling on Cubase SE. It’s inexpensive, incredibly reliable and when you put it in record mode it stays there until you take it out. I can start recording, shut down the laptop, go to the restroom, come back, execute Remote Desktop, and re-connect to Cubase which is still recording. Further, when you stop recording in Cubase it stops immediately and can be put into record again instantly. The SONY software and all others tested took extensive time to save each track and then “re-draw” the wave forms. So, I use Cubase to record, then pull the tracks into Vegas and Sound Forge for editing and mastering (to include CD-Text) and CD-Architect for the final product. (SONY indicates no interest in fixing the functional flaw in their software even though I brought it to their attention.)



Hopefully this will whet your appetite and excite your imagination in other ways to think “outside the box.” Pursue it! Recall the doctor that discovered ulcers were usually caused by simple bacteria. The multi-million dollar labs and researchers missed it.



Just so in our business! You don’t need Cobra networks and Cobra enabled equipment. It’s really much simpler than all that!



Copyright 2006 Harold (Steve) Jones W5HSJ



Addendum: September 8, 2006

I just replaced the Linksys Wireless-G w/Speedbooster Router (WRT54GS) with the new Netgear "N" Router with Gigabit switch (WNR854T) and added the PCMCIA "N" Card (WN511T) to my laptop. The throughput is enormously improved. I'm seeing data rates as high as 300 Mbps vs 54 Mbps with the older Linksys unit. (The Netgear is the only "N" MIMO unit as of this writing that does it right, by the way). The result is much smoother operation using Remote Desktop. I can even play return audio smoothly. However, this requires using Microsoft Sound Mapper or Classic Wave Driver on playback in the remote computer. I am unable to find a way to loop audio from an external breakout box such as the MOTU Traveler of Delta 1010 back to the remote computer audio stream. There is a large lag or latency in the playback anyway so it appears the return audio would not be a good way to monitor after all. Using the Ramsey FM transmitter as described above does away with latency and allows for monitoring of individual microphones, etc. So it's still the best way to go.

Comments

BradlyMusic wrote on 9/8/2006, 2:51 PM
Although, this all sounds a bit confusing I think I've got the concept. Basically, you're using a wireless network, and enabling remote desktop to control another PC that has all the software and hardware connected to it. Does that about summarize those 10 paragraphs of information?

Here's something else that might even be simpler. The MOTU Traveler device that you mentioned has hardware controler support. Thus my thinking is that you could elliminate the laptop PC and wireless network set up all together, but using a device like Frontier Designs Tranzport and a pair of wireless headphones. Thus, the Tranzport could be setup to wirelessly control the MOTU interface and also your recording software. An output of the MOTU could be connected to a wireless broadcasting device which gets picked up by the wireless headphones. So now with this method, I've eccentially just elliminated the need for your wireless network setup, saving on costs of the wireless router and PCM card for the laptop and the additional mess of an ethernet cable run from the PC to the router and the power supply cable to power the network router. I've also saved on the cost of purchasing a laptop. Plus, the Tranzport is much smaller and doesn't draw the power that a laptop does.....thus, having your laptop battery die out on you is always a concern, since most of them run for a duration of 2-4hrs......if it's fully charged before you start.

It's a nice novelty set-up you got going on there, but I really think it could be reduced in simplicity in both setup and the amount of equipment a bit further than you have gone yet.

I haven't tried it, but I really think some components could be elliminated in your entire setup and replaced. Saving on costs and simplifying your setup even further. Remember, the more complicated your setup becomes, with more devices, the more introduction of problems that can happen.

Your setup:
1. Wireless Network
2. PCMcia Wireless adapter
3. Laptop
4. Headphones

Replace with:
1. Frontier Designs Tranzport (Wireless Daw controler)
2. Wireless headpones

http://www.frontierdesign.com/
pwppch wrote on 9/8/2006, 4:57 PM
>>(SONY indicates no interest in fixing the functional flaw in their software even though I brought it to their attention.)<<

Who's attention did you bring it to?

Peter
Sijon wrote on 9/11/2006, 1:48 PM
Sorry for being late in replying. Been traveling!

I confess I have never heard of the company or device you described. You may be right. I haven't tried it, of course.

My efforts were at using off-the-shelf hardware that I would have with me anyway and the mass production of such devices keeps the cost down. We buildup all our computers here including laptops. I'm a little leery of specialized devices because of the end-of-life problem of what do you do with it whereas off-the-shelf equipment always has resale value.

The router also has specialized functions such as MAC filtering and, I would think, much better security. And, then too, I need a second channel for controlling the Marantz PMD570. In the past I've had a hard drive fail in the middle of a concert. That's when I began using a backup/simultaneous recorder. I would feel rather foolish to drive 1500 miles and lose a recording!
Sijon wrote on 9/11/2006, 1:52 PM
Since it is no longer possible to get through to Technical Support on the phone I used your email option. Several days later I sent a second post. I received no reply from either post even though a header said you reply to all messages.
Sijon wrote on 9/11/2006, 2:43 PM
Guess I owe you a little more explanation. Because the rack computer has no screen or keyboard the laptop is essential as I quite often edit in a motel room or with the client. The first thing I do is copy all recorded files to the laptop. This way (knock on wood) I've not lost any work since that disastrous drive failure. Normal turn around on a job is a week or less - from recording to finished CD (usually anywhere from 50 to 1000).

I want to replace the IBM Netvista (2U) with a 1U computer. However, because of the rather deep chassis sizes available I've determined to use a Merom duo core laptop. That gives me redundancy in a very small package, less weight and a 1U package. This will enable me to get everything in an SKB 6U rack. I use the 1650 x 1050 matte screens on my laptops so an enormous amount of info is on the screen at all times.