Comments

DGates wrote on 2/8/2010, 7:57 PM
I'm currently beta-testing Vegas 10, but because of the non-disclosure agreement, I can't say that I am.

One little peeve I have with it: They've replaced the FX 'eye' with one of Marty Feldman's. Not sure why.



Yoyodyne wrote on 2/8/2010, 8:15 PM
We have a winner! Nice!
Grazie wrote on 2/9/2010, 1:01 AM
Excellent! - Ah, Marty . . . . One of Nature's sons.

Grazie
FrigidNDEditing wrote on 2/9/2010, 1:10 AM
I have my doubts that there will be a 10 at N.A.B.

they went a long time on 9 (year and a half or something like that) from the release of 8. If they keep that up it'll probably be IBC this year, or something like that, but who knows, time will tell.

Dave
Mahesh wrote on 2/9/2010, 1:26 AM
I haven't dusted my V9 yet:(
Still using V8.
PeterWright wrote on 2/9/2010, 2:19 AM
I heard they were going to miss 10 and go straight to 11, as a sort of tribute to Spinal Tap.
ushere wrote on 2/9/2010, 4:25 AM
afaic, they'd better sort out 9 before hoisting 10 on me!

i love vegas, but there's absolutely no way i'd pay for even an upgrade while there's so many apparent problems with 9c. (render / red-green frames / memory / preview / etc)

leslie
Laurence wrote on 2/9/2010, 4:44 AM
When you can look at the timeline and not see any red, when Vegas doesn't suddenly disappear for no reason, when none of the extended functions have completely bizarre behavior, when most of the codecs work, when you are simply editing instead of being stopped in your tracks and having to troubleshoot . . . that's when you know that a new version is about due. Lately editing in Vegas has been pretty smooth and trouble free. I would guess that means we are due for a new version. ;-)
UlfLaursen wrote on 2/9/2010, 5:15 AM
They've replaced the FX 'eye' with one of Marty Feldman's. Not sure why.

Nice!!! Like it :-)

/Ulf
Dach wrote on 2/9/2010, 6:26 AM
If everything was working fine... why would we need a new version? Of course new features of signifance would be nice.

I'd like to see a new "product" of some sort.

Chad
JohnnyRoy wrote on 2/9/2010, 6:56 AM
> I heard they were going to miss 10 and go straight to 11, as a sort of tribute to Spinal Tap.

lol, Well... after all... 11 is one better now isn't it? :-D

~jr
Editguy43 wrote on 2/9/2010, 7:15 AM
AHHHHHHHHHHHHHH those EYES they are peering into my soul.

"I think his name was aby.....aby somthing........aby-normal"

Great simply great!!!
Earl_J wrote on 2/9/2010, 9:16 AM
Hump...? What hump?
Marco. wrote on 2/9/2010, 10:06 AM
Yes, it's one louder! :D

Marco
Byron K wrote on 2/9/2010, 10:13 AM
Posted by: cliff_622, Date: 2/8/2010 3:19:28 PM

Anybody know about Vegas Pro 10?
Will it even be called "Vegas pro 10" at all?"

Being a user of Studio for many years, I thought that they usually release the Studio upgraded version before the Pro?

Maybe they'll call it Vegas Pro X like all the other SW developers. (;
GlennChan wrote on 2/9/2010, 10:40 AM
Vegas 10 will come out...

Sometime
Only
Not
Yet

;) And that's the 110% truth!!!!

(Uh... so many silly posts can we stick into this thread?)
jetdv wrote on 2/9/2010, 10:44 AM
Let's see....

Vegas 9 was released April 2009 (NAB)
Vegas 8 was released September 2007. (IBC)
Vegas 7 was released September 2006. (IBC)
Vegas 6 was released April 2005. (NAB)
Vegas 5 was released April 2004. (NAB)
(Sony purchased it in mid 2003)
Vegas 4 was released April 2003 but had a public beta starting around January.
Vegas 3 was somewhere around December 2001/January 2002
Jay Gladwell wrote on 2/9/2010, 11:16 AM

"Vegas 3 was somewhere around December 2001/January 2002"

My "first love." What memories!


rs170a wrote on 2/9/2010, 11:51 AM
Vegas 1.0 was my "first love", many many years ago.
I used it for audio sweetening on a 3/4" suite.
2 audio tracks were SO limiting.

Mike
DGates wrote on 2/9/2010, 12:06 PM
Vegas 3 was when I came on board as well.
rmack350 wrote on 2/10/2010, 8:39 AM
I heard they were going to miss 10 and go straight to 11

If they had rebuilt the application, and if you could tell they'd done it, then skipping 10 to go to 11 would probably make good marketing sense. However, new versions of Vegas are never that earth shaking.

I'd place my bets on IBC, with a release of Studio earlier. I usually assume Vegas will take a year and a half for a new Rev but Ed's timeline says that it could easily be a year. Honestly, I don't think they've finished with 9.0 yet and it'd be kind if they let people with 9.0 use it for 6 months in a more stable form.

Is it time to start some of those epic "What I want in Vegas 10" threads?

Rob
busterkeaton wrote on 2/10/2010, 9:03 AM
Eye, Eye? Eye.wav
jwcarney wrote on 2/10/2010, 9:08 AM
I'd like to see them add7.1 mixing, and the ability to play nice with Pro Tools. (Export/Import).
An option to lock it into an 'AVID mode' to creat/export EDLs that can be used in said product.
Think about how cool that would be for Directors/Editors in the field. No need to purchase 2400.00 worth of software just to make cuts And Vegas can read QT based DNXHD files..