VERY interesting, and sorta HD, too.
Quryous
wrote on 1/18/2006, 7:23 PM
Comments
Sol M.
wrote on 1/19/2006, 3:16 PM
Yeah, it's HD in the same way HDV is HD (ducks and runs for cover)
It technically meets the HD spec (720p), but of course, it's compressed quite a bit to fit the video on a SD card, so quality will take a hit. I'm interested to see how well the MPEG-4 codec they're using handles the task.
Neat little device. Doubt I'd ever use it for a production tho.
It technically meets the HD spec (720p), but of course, it's compressed quite a bit to fit the video on a SD card, so quality will take a hit. I'm interested to see how well the MPEG-4 codec they're using handles the task.
Neat little device. Doubt I'd ever use it for a production tho.
rs170a
wrote on 1/19/2006, 6:06 PM
Doubt I'd ever use it for a production tho.
You might not but I guarantee that very soon a client will walk in, hand you the camera, and say "I need this footage edited"
:-(
Mike
You might not but I guarantee that very soon a client will walk in, hand you the camera, and say "I need this footage edited"
:-(
Mike
Quryous
wrote on 1/19/2006, 6:19 PM
And as soon as someone walks in and asks YOU to edit it, you will want to know why Sony Vegas doesn't already handle it in a "professional" way. Yea, right!
Laurence
wrote on 1/19/2006, 6:47 PM
Sombody posted a link to some footage from this camera on the DVInfo newsgroup. It was VERY impressive. Just some family shots, but boy was the video quality great!
Chienworks
wrote on 1/20/2006, 3:45 AM
What the heck does "Super-fast 9Mbs Frame Rate" mean? I get the feeling that someone in marketing just wanted to write something impressive, and never checked with the engineering department about how to say it right.