Comments

Grazie wrote on 12/12/2004, 1:29 AM
I've left at the factory default, "Good" . .. apparently we can't register the difference. There has been a discussion about this and you may wish to read those threads to add some more knowledge to your VIdTank !

But yes, I'd leave it at Good.

Grazie
Grazie wrote on 12/12/2004, 1:31 AM
. . oh . .BTW these Pages need the <> rather than the [ ] for introducing formatting . . yeah? :)


Grazie
Kwak wrote on 12/12/2004, 1:32 AM
Yeah! :) Thanks.
Sunfox wrote on 12/12/2004, 3:57 AM
In my tests I saw a clear difference on best vs. good on anything that needs to be resized.

Although most of you guys probably aren't as anal as I!
Grazie wrote on 12/12/2004, 5:07 AM
Oh . .! I wouldn't say that ... I just wouldn't say it . . . :) . .. g
skibumm101 wrote on 12/12/2004, 10:42 AM
So if i am using the 16:9 preset in the track motionfor my 4:3 i should render at best?
RedEyeRob wrote on 12/12/2004, 8:04 PM
Why not render an avi of 10-20 seconds of each and watch it to decide for yourself. If you can't tell the difference, use good to save rendering time.
Grazie wrote on 12/12/2004, 10:43 PM
Nice one Red! . . Nice one . . ;-)

G
jaegersing wrote on 12/13/2004, 3:06 AM
Hi Grazie. Assuming that Best is better than Good in certain circumstances (must be, right, otherwise there would be no such setting?), the problem is that the 20 second sample might not be representative of the condition where Best makes a difference. With a different sample, maybe Best would be noticeably better and worth the extra rendering time?

Anyway, since I live in Singapore, I tend to be more "kiasu" (meaning afraid to lose out), so I always select Best for rendering quality. And to return to the original question, after setting the rendering quality to Best, I saved the setting as a new preset (such as "DV PAL Best") which is easy to find the next time I need it.

Richard Hunter