What's wrong with the VB support in vegas, really?

lnetzel wrote on 7/16/2003, 6:38 AM
I have bumped into some serious VB errors.

--------------------------------------------------
Error number 1:
I can't run more than ONE VBscript in Vegas, if I try running another it's ALWAYS the first script I ran the starts again. I can only run ONE script. IF I want to run another script I wll have to restart Vegas, does'nt matter if I make shortcuts or just run them.

Now, if I run a JScript everything is fine, can add many and run different scripts!
-------------------------------------------------
Error number 2:
If I run a Jscript before a VBscript I get this error!

"Error Running:
Method SOnicFoundry.Vegas._Startup.PushVBhostIntoLibrary not found."
---------------------------------------------------

I always have to restart Vegas to run my vb scripts!

I'm not sure if have missed an update or something but this really can't be the way it's left to work for all time right? Cause then you shouldn't keep the text "VBscript support" with this product!

I guess I'll have to go with Jscript as everybody else!

Does anyone know what to do? Should I send a bugreport or what?

Comments

roger_74 wrote on 7/16/2003, 6:45 AM
It might be Microsoft VSA that's the problem, not necessarily Vegas. Try Microsoft's newsgroup: microsoft.public.dotnet.vsa

SonyPJM wrote on 7/21/2003, 1:55 PM
I have not been able to reproduce either of these problems.
jetdv wrote on 7/21/2003, 2:36 PM
I have also gotten the

Method SOnicFoundry.Vegas._Startup.PushVBhostIntoLibrary not found

error message when attempting to run a VBScript.
lnetzel wrote on 7/22/2003, 2:06 AM
I got it at my job too I have the same configuration there as I have it at home:

Windows W2K Pro
Service Pack 3
.NET Framework 1.1
Vegas Video 4.0c

/Lars

SonyPJM wrote on 7/22/2003, 9:04 AM
I'll do more tests... maybe it is .Net Framework 1.1. Thanks for the info.
SonyPJM wrote on 7/29/2003, 10:42 AM
I believe I've found the bug and these problems should be fixed in 4.0d.
lnetzel wrote on 7/30/2003, 3:34 AM
Awsome! Then I won't have to get way to much into the Jscript syntax:)