Why on earth no 3D Video FX on VV4????

steinar2 wrote on 3/25/2003, 4:18 AM

Why on earth haven’t SF supplied us with a 3D Video FX in VV4???? It would seem so simple as they’ve already provided the 3D transitions. OK, one can always use Satish’s plug in but it simply does not give satisfying results in PAL mode.

SoFo?

Comments

roger_74 wrote on 3/25/2003, 5:49 AM

Are you saying it's worse in PAL than in NTSC? How?

steinar2 wrote on 3/26/2003, 2:50 AM

It seems to be a problem about the way it handles interlaced footage. In NTSC it does a great job but in PAL it seem to disregard the fact that the footage is interlaced. I think you can imagine the results, it’s not pretty! But anyway, I still think it’s strange that SF has not supplied a 3D filter, but I guess you can’t have it all… :(

satish wrote on 3/26/2003, 9:03 AM

The issue could be that i dont process interlated frames properly.. I'll check it out. Thanks

steinar2 wrote on 3/26/2003, 9:36 AM

That would be nice.... I hate to load After Effects every time I need to do some 3D stuff.

wcoxe1 wrote on 3/26/2003, 10:30 AM

Now THERE is a MAN.

.. I'll check it out. Thanks

Go, Satish!