-
Audioon 12/22/2003
CD Burn Probs still exist
For me the error never occurred when burning the disc on the fly (=no pre-render).
-
Audioon 12/18/2003
CD Burn Probs still exist
At the end of the project I have a long fade out. The fade was originally created by a region based fade. First I dragged the CD End Index 2 sec further on the timeline. This did not cure the problem. Then I removed the region based fade at the end and re-created it with the track volume curve. After the actual -inf dB point I extended the last region so that it played for 2 more seconds at absolute silence. This procedure at last allowed to render the project properly.
-
Audioon 12/18/2003
CD Burn Probs still exist
I have a Plextor 40/12/40A with the latest firmware (1.05) The problem is: I can choose the burn speed, but this does not seem to have an influence on the actual speed the disc is burned with... axel
-
Audioon 12/17/2003
CD Burn Probs still exist
I have a project I need to prerender, because my machine simply can't keep up the speed with some power consuming plugins. The problem is that still the last 2 seconds of a prerendered projects are clipped of when playing the CD. Even when converting the DOA temp file into a wave file, one can see that the last 2 seconds are missing. Maybe my system could burn the CD if Vegas would let ***me*** choose the burn speed instead of always burning at least at 4x speed not matter what I selected before... Any comments?
-
Audioon 8/28/2003
CD burning with VV - question
Just to add my own experience: I also wonder why Vegas burns at 4x speed when I chose 2x from the DAO dialog (Burner: Plextor PX W40-12A) On the other hand it is surely true that burning *slowest* is not necessarily *best*. axel
-
Audioon 8/22/2003
CD Burn Probs still exist
My OS is XPpro (sp1). I am also using a Plextor burner. What are the issues with these drives?
-
Audioon 8/21/2003
CD Burn Probs still exist
I burned the same project on-the-fly. This time the problem did not occur; the fade out at the project end was correctly completed. Axel
-
Audioon 8/21/2003
CD Burn Probs still exist
I will try to burn the CD without prerendering it later. There is something I found which might relate to the problem: my timeline started originally at 0:00:00:00, so Vegas should add 2 seconds. But: switching the ruler format to "Time" after the CD track layout is finished shows, that the timeline now starts at 0:00:04:00 instead of 0:00:02:00. If I am right these are exactly the 2 seconds that are missing at the end. What do you think?
-
Audioon 8/21/2003
CD Burn Probs still exist
Yes, I just ran into exactly the same problem: had a CD with a length of 45min with an applause fade out at the end. About 2 or 3 seconds before the "real" end audio stopped on the burned CD. I have burned this Disc DAO and had prerendered it to a temporary file before. Axel
-
Audioon 6/6/2003
EDL Convert Update available
If you have any questions, feel free to contact our support team (even if you are not a customer yet) Thanks, Axel
-
Videoon 6/6/2003
EDL Convert Update available
Currently we are supporting audio tracks only. There were plans to include CMX, Grass Valley and Sony BVE, and we already had been working on that. We canceled implementation of those formats at a certain point of the devleopment and gave other formats priority.
-
Audioon 6/5/2003
Can now import OMF media from AVID and others
Maybe you should try EDL Convert Pro: it supports OMF ( external and internal mode) adn the Vegas Text EDL format. These are the two formats that build the bridge between PT and Vegas. We have just released an update + a new demo installer. If you would like to try it, go to: www.cuibono-soft.com/Downloads/Demos/demos.html The version is limited: it reads only the first 23 entries. With that you should be able to test the software with small projects. P.S.: If you think $799.00 is expensive, take a look at our offer... Thanks, Axel Cui Bono Soft
-
Audioon 1/21/2003
Plans for Vegas 4?
If you like, send us the Vegas text edl you are having trouble with and we will look into it. Greetings, Axel CuiBono-Soft mailto: support@cuibono-soft.com
-
Videoon 9/27/2001
convert session from Cool Edit Pro
It supports the Vegas text? Where do I get this tool? Is it shareware?
-
Videoon 3/14/2001
DirectX 8 and Vegas Problems
Hi, I don't have a workaround for this, but I want to let you know that I am experiencing excatly the same behaviour. Installed both updates (DX8 runtime + DX8 DVupdate). I am on Win98, not Win98se (?) Axel
-
Videoon 2/14/2001
EDL.txt files
My experience with Vegas' ability to read CMX files is that it interprets all CMX files as if they were 30fps.
-
Videoon 5/30/2000
Metronome in vegas?
In the Project Properties (file=> properties=>ruler) you can set the beats per minute. After that switch the grid spacing (options=>grid spacing) to measures. Axel David W. Ruby wrote: >>Can you tell me how to adjust tempo for metronome?I see >>nothing in the help yet. >>Thanx. >>2.0 is excellent.:-) >>DR
-
Videoon 5/21/2000
Sonic Foundry ERASES opinions not to their liking....
Why do you try to force other users - perhaps satisfied users - to share your opinion? Do you have nothing better to do? And no, I don't want to answer your in detail. I simply disagree with you. SamTee >>Take it easy, Rubie. >> >>My attitude? One of objectivity. Pure and simple. >>Your sensibility wouldn't be offended if you were a little more >>honest. >>Admit, like Karl did, that Vegas is NOT a true multitracker. >>Vegas is VERY GOOD at mixing ONCE YOU HAVE YOUR SOUND FILES IN THE >>HARD DRIVE!!! >>Vegas SHOULD be ACID v3.0. >>Trying to deny the obvious just makes you appear foolish. Statements >>like 'ProTools took a major ass kicking from SAWPRO in a >>test last month.I was there' only show your ignorance. Because, among >>other things, if that were the case, you wouldn't have any use for >>Vegas Pro. >>Also, after 25 years of "pro" experience >>plus ownership of a "very pro" (read $12/hr) studio, recording indie >>(read "no deal in sight") bands, it's very sad that you will "end up >>buying" Vegas to "cut" your "biggest artist on it". >>BTW,would you dare disclose the name of your "biggest artist" after >>25 years in the business?. Pathetic... >> >>No real answers, yet. >> >>But do not despair, my friends: Eight is nothing, but a zero with a >>tight belt! >> >>Try a little harder... >>
-
Videoon 1/27/2000
Mixing part 2, The later years
Although this thread is already way too long, I'd like to point out that the "copy with all media" in fact is a feature to get rid off unneeded takes. Of course you cannot compact the edited material in order to save space. Each wav-file will have it's original length, not matter how short the clip is you use out of it. But: from the 41 guitar solos you recorded, there's only 1 you want to keep. Here you can use "copy with all media". Only the files used in the arrange window of your project will be copied along with the project file itself to a folder of your choice. Didn't Carl ask for something like that? => "In the process of recording I have collected a large number of extra takes and files such as solos that wanted to compare or comp together in folder. At mixing time (no matter where I want to do it) I would like to be able to save only the waves or tracks that i want to keep." Cheers, Axel Charles de Montebello wrote: >> >>That's actually not true... It copies all media referenced in the >>project - not just the portions visible or edited. It's not a way to >>save space - like compacting in Pro Tools. It is a nice way to get >>everything in one place, though... >> >>Axel Gutzler wrote: >>>>After your 4th email I understood what you are talking about... >>>> >>>>The checkbox "copy with all media" combined with the "save as" >>>>command copies all media that is used in the project and only the >>>>used media (!) to a specific folder. Is that what you want? I read >>it >>>>in the manual... >>>> >>>>Axel >>>> >>>>Carl Edwards wrote: >>>>>>My email is acting a little crazy try phlatulus@aol.com. >>>>>> >>>>>>Carl Edwards wrote: >>>>>>>>Ok. Let's try again. What i mean by active is all tracks (or >>the >>>>>>>>waves files that make them) that i am using for my project. In >>>>the >>>>>>>>process of recording I have collected a large number of extra >>>>takes >>>>>>>>and files such as solos that wanted to compare or comp together >>>>in >>>>>>a >>>>>>>>folder. At mixing time (no matter where I want to do it) I >>would >>>>>>like >>>>>>>>to be able to save only the waves or tracks that i want to >>keep. >>>>At >>>>>>>>this point I have to go into explorer and find the tracks, but >>>>why >>>>>>do >>>>>>>>that if I can move the wave files I am using (and only those >>>>files) >>>>>>>>into another folder using a "save as/ active tracks/ as they sit >>>>>>>>(regardless of their being mono or stereo, raw waves) function" >>>>>>>>This would make transporting, storage, and disc cleanup a ton >>>>>>easier. >>>>>>>>As of this thread a "save as" gives me only a mix and "all >>media" >>>>>>>>funtion. I dont need "all media" because I can do that in >>>>explorer >>>>>>by >>>>>>>>moving the entire file or copying it. The "save as/ active >>tracks >>>>>>or >>>>>>>>waves in use" check box would only give me the files that I >>>>needed. >>>>>>>>This would give me a folder that would contain only the files I >>>>am >>>>>>>>using for my project and i could then store them or just clean >>up >>>>>>the >>>>>>>>extra wave files without fear of burning something that I need. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Thomas Kay wrote: >>>>>>>>>>"When you do a Save As or a Mix to New, Vegas will pay >>>>attention >>>>>>to >>>>>>>>>>all mutes and solos, whether on a track or a main bus. If you >>>>>>want >>>>>>>>to >>>>>>>>>>export one file for each track, you will have to do a Save As >>>>for >>>>>>>>>>each track, soloing the track you want to export. If you use >>>>the >>>>>>>>>>main busses as sub mixes, you can generate a file per bus by >>>>>>>>soloing >>>>>>>>>>each of the buses in turn and doing a Save As." >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>I might not be following, but does the above entry from Peter >>>>>>>>explain >>>>>>>>>>what Carl wants to do? For instance, I transported my files >>>>from >>>>>>>>>>Cubase by "connecting" takes on the same track by setting my >>>>cue >>>>>>>>>>points at the beginning and end of the song and it allowed me >>>>to >>>>>>>>set >>>>>>>>>>all my tracks at one length through the export feature. I had >>>>to >>>>>>>>mute >>>>>>>>>>the track that I wanted to export and also route it through >>the >>>>>>>>main >>>>>>>>>>buss. Is that the same thing, Peter? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>"I need to be able to join wave files in a track, make them >>all >>>>>>>>long >>>>>>>>>>enough to start at the begining and put all the active ones >>in >>>>a >>>>>>>>>>folder." >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Carl, this statement alone tells me that you have been >>>>recording >>>>>>>>long >>>>>>>>>>enough to understand that some would certainly be offended by >>>>>>your >>>>>>>>>>opening remarks instead of just getting to the question you >>>>>>wanted >>>>>>>>>>answered. Try getting a dialog that has been as supportive as >>>>>>Peter >>>>>>>>>>has been from other companies. It almost doesn't exist. It >>>>>>doesn't >>>>>>>>do >>>>>>>>>>any good to kiss their asses or beat them up. You purchased >>the >>>>>>>>>>program with which you had the ability to download in full >>>>before >>>>>>>>>>buying. So if it doesn't live up, it's your fault. I, like >>you, >>>>>>>>have >>>>>>>>>>a wish list for SF that I hope they pursue. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Hey, you're free to say and act like you want. I'm not >>telling >>>>>>you >>>>>>>>>>how to live. But act like a nervous aggressive and you'll be >>>>>>>>treated >>>>>>>>>>as such. By the way, if you can channel this aggressiveness >>>>into >>>>>>>>>>songs that are worth listening to, post your link to an MP3 >>and >>>>>>>>I'll >>>>>>>>>>give it a listen. Peace. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Peter Haller wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>I guess I follow what you want, though I am not clear what >>>>you >>>>>>>>mean >>>>>>>>>>>>by active tracks. By being active to mean tracks that are >>not >>>>>>>>>>muted? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>All tracks in Vegas are always part of the mix. If the >>track >>>>is >>>>>>>>>>>>muted, it is just mixing silence. Even if a track has no >>>>>>events, >>>>>>>>it >>>>>>>>>>>>is part of the mix, it just doesn't contibute anything to >>the >>>>>>mix. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>So a simple way to rendering each track - pre main bus or >>>>>>post? - >>>>>>>>>>to >>>>>>>>>>>>a sepeate wave file is what you want. This way if a track >>is >>>>>>>>made >>>>>>>>>>up >>>>>>>>>>>>of multiple events, each from a different files,parts of >>>>other >>>>>>>>>>files, >>>>>>>>>>>>or the same file repeated, and say the first event in that >>>>>>track >>>>>>>>>>>>doesn't actually start until 25 seconds into the track and >>>>the >>>>>>>>>>total >>>>>>>>>>>>length of the track is 4 minutes, you would get a single >>wave >>>>>>>>file >>>>>>>>>>>>that is 4 minutes in length. With or with out track >>>>processing - >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>i.e. >>>>>>>>>>>>insert fx, volume envelopes? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>You would loose any assignable fx you may have routed as >>this >>>>>>is >>>>>>>>a >>>>>>>>>>>>bus mixing aspect of Vegas. You would loose any pan >>>>information >>>>>>>>on >>>>>>>>>>>>mono tracks, as this is done prior to the bus level since >>we >>>>>>>>always >>>>>>>>>>>>mix to stereo buses. (There is no way to rout a track to a >>>>>>single >>>>>>>>>>>>channel of a bus other than hard panning left or right.) >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>My intial reaction is that this is an exception to the use >>>>that >>>>>>>>>>Vegas >>>>>>>>>>>>was designed for. It would involve a different mixing >>>>paradigm >>>>>>>>than >>>>>>>>>>>>we have in place. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>I will have to run this o
-
Videoon 1/26/2000
Mixing part 2, The later years
After your 4th email I understood what you are talking about... The checkbox "copy with all media" combined with the "save as" command copies all media that is used in the project and only the used media (!) to a specific folder. Is that what you want? I read it in the manual... Axel Carl Edwards wrote: >>My email is acting a little crazy try phlatulus@aol.com. >> >>Carl Edwards wrote: >>>>Ok. Let's try again. What i mean by active is all tracks (or the >>>>waves files that make them) that i am using for my project. In the >>>>process of recording I have collected a large number of extra takes >>>>and files such as solos that wanted to compare or comp together in >>a >>>>folder. At mixing time (no matter where I want to do it) I would >>like >>>>to be able to save only the waves or tracks that i want to keep. At >>>>this point I have to go into explorer and find the tracks, but why >>do >>>>that if I can move the wave files I am using (and only those files) >>>>into another folder using a "save as/ active tracks/ as they sit >>>>(regardless of their being mono or stereo, raw waves) function" >>>>This would make transporting, storage, and disc cleanup a ton >>easier. >>>>As of this thread a "save as" gives me only a mix and "all media" >>>>funtion. I dont need "all media" because I can do that in explorer >>by >>>>moving the entire file or copying it. The "save as/ active tracks >>or >>>>waves in use" check box would only give me the files that I needed. >>>>This would give me a folder that would contain only the files I am >>>>using for my project and i could then store them or just clean up >>the >>>>extra wave files without fear of burning something that I need. >>>> >>>>Thomas Kay wrote: >>>>>>"When you do a Save As or a Mix to New, Vegas will pay attention >>to >>>>>>all mutes and solos, whether on a track or a main bus. If you >>want >>>>to >>>>>>export one file for each track, you will have to do a Save As for >>>>>>each track, soloing the track you want to export. If you use the >>>>>>main busses as sub mixes, you can generate a file per bus by >>>>soloing >>>>>>each of the buses in turn and doing a Save As." >>>>>> >>>>>>I might not be following, but does the above entry from Peter >>>>explain >>>>>>what Carl wants to do? For instance, I transported my files from >>>>>>Cubase by "connecting" takes on the same track by setting my cue >>>>>>points at the beginning and end of the song and it allowed me to >>>>set >>>>>>all my tracks at one length through the export feature. I had to >>>>mute >>>>>>the track that I wanted to export and also route it through the >>>>main >>>>>>buss. Is that the same thing, Peter? >>>>>> >>>>>>"I need to be able to join wave files in a track, make them all >>>>long >>>>>>enough to start at the begining and put all the active ones in a >>>>>>folder." >>>>>> >>>>>>Carl, this statement alone tells me that you have been recording >>>>long >>>>>>enough to understand that some would certainly be offended by >>your >>>>>>opening remarks instead of just getting to the question you >>wanted >>>>>>answered. Try getting a dialog that has been as supportive as >>Peter >>>>>>has been from other companies. It almost doesn't exist. It >>doesn't >>>>do >>>>>>any good to kiss their asses or beat them up. You purchased the >>>>>>program with which you had the ability to download in full before >>>>>>buying. So if it doesn't live up, it's your fault. I, like you, >>>>have >>>>>>a wish list for SF that I hope they pursue. >>>>>> >>>>>>Hey, you're free to say and act like you want. I'm not telling >>you >>>>>>how to live. But act like a nervous aggressive and you'll be >>>>treated >>>>>>as such. By the way, if you can channel this aggressiveness into >>>>>>songs that are worth listening to, post your link to an MP3 and >>>>I'll >>>>>>give it a listen. Peace. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>Peter Haller wrote: >>>>>>>>I guess I follow what you want, though I am not clear what you >>>>mean >>>>>>>>by active tracks. By being active to mean tracks that are not >>>>>>muted? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>All tracks in Vegas are always part of the mix. If the track is >>>>>>>>muted, it is just mixing silence. Even if a track has no >>events, >>>>it >>>>>>>>is part of the mix, it just doesn't contibute anything to the >>mix. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>So a simple way to rendering each track - pre main bus or >>post? - >>>>>>to >>>>>>>>a sepeate wave file is what you want. This way if a track is >>>>made >>>>>>up >>>>>>>>of multiple events, each from a different files,parts of other >>>>>>files, >>>>>>>>or the same file repeated, and say the first event in that >>track >>>>>>>>doesn't actually start until 25 seconds into the track and the >>>>>>total >>>>>>>>length of the track is 4 minutes, you would get a single wave >>>>file >>>>>>>>that is 4 minutes in length. With or with out track processing - >> >>>>>>i.e. >>>>>>>>insert fx, volume envelopes? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>You would loose any assignable fx you may have routed as this >>is >>>>a >>>>>>>>bus mixing aspect of Vegas. You would loose any pan information >>>>on >>>>>>>>mono tracks, as this is done prior to the bus level since we >>>>always >>>>>>>>mix to stereo buses. (There is no way to rout a track to a >>single >>>>>>>>channel of a bus other than hard panning left or right.) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>My intial reaction is that this is an exception to the use that >>>>>>Vegas >>>>>>>>was designed for. It would involve a different mixing paradigm >>>>than >>>>>>>>we have in place. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>I will have to run this one by the other developers to see what >>>>>>they >>>>>>>>think. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Thanks >>>>>>>>Peter >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Carl Edwards wrote: >>>>>>>>>>Basically, what i would like is a checkbox in the "save as" >>>>menu >>>>>>>>that >>>>>>>>>>says "save active tracks only". That shouldnt be so hard. >>That >>>>>>way >>>>>>>>>>those of us that can track reasonably and maybe not mix well, >>>>or >>>>>>>>>>those that have had their projects requests by other people >>>>>>>>>>(producers, labels, etc) to collect the wave files in a >>folder >>>>to >>>>>>>>be >>>>>>>>>>taken somewhere else to be worked on. Yes, Vegas does a great >>>>job >>>>>>>>>>tracking ( and btw since you explained it, mixing), but I'm >>>>doing >>>>>>>>>>basic tracks at home and plan on doing other work in a bigger >>>>>>>>studio. >>>>>>>>>>I need to be able to join wave files in a track, make them >>all >>>>>>long >>>>>>>>>>enough to start at the begining and put all the active ones >>in >>>>a >>>>>>>>>>folder. The way it is now it'll take a long time to do this. >>>>>>Where >>>>>>>>as >>>>>>>>>>you could let me mix any mono track to a new mono track ( >>that >>>>>>>>gives >>>>>>>>>>me joining and length actually) and the "save as""active >>>>tracks" >>>>>>>>>>thing. I do not write code but it seems that the " save as " >>>>>>thing >>>>>>>>>>would be pretty easy, and the mix mono track not so bad. It >>>>sure >>>>>>>>>>would make alot of peoples life easier. To further speak of >>>>this >>>>>>>>>>think of the money one can spend on studio gear: monitors, >>>>>>cables, >>>>>>>>>>rack effects, plug-ins, sound dampening, amps, mics, pres, >>the >>>>>>list >>>>>>>>>>goes on. It's all i could do to buy the stuff I have what I'm >>>>>>>>asking >>>>>>>>>>would just add some very useful options for us that want to >>>>make >>>>>>>>our >>>>>>>>>>projects better and have chosen to at least start ( and, >>>>>>hopefully >>>>>>>>>>finish with more gear and such in the future) our projects >>w
-
Videoon 11/23/1999
work surface
Then they were three... I would like to see Jog/Dial control for scrubbing via Midi, too. Axel Marco Trinchero wrote: >>No Erich... you're not the only 1, but, you know, it seems people @ >>Sonic Foundry doesen't believe in Vegas as a serious alternative to >>more expensive multitrack editors as Protools. >>Me too i've asked for Jog/Dial and transport control via midi and i'm >>still waiting for an answer... >> >>Erich Grube wrote: >>>>Am I the only guy out here using Vegas and REALLY wanting a >>>>worksurface for mixing. I have a modest case of tendinitis >>>>in my 'mousing wrist', spend all day at work on a pc, and >>>>would really apprectiate having mixing functions placed on >>>>a piece of hardware other than a mouse. >>>> >>>>I understand that the program doesn't expose it's interface >>>>to midi control. Was that something that got cut out to >>>>make a release date? >>>> >>>>How 'bout a surface that connected via USB, had 16 sliders, >>>>assigned by default this way: 8 to the first eight track >>>>volumes, and eight to the first eight busses volumes (move >>>>the buss or track around and the assignment changes >>>>accordingly), a quick up and down arrow for changing the >>>>assignments for both groups to the next pair of 8. Each >>>>track strip and buss strip should have mute, solo, and pan >>>>knobs (an alpha/num display for panning would be groovy). >>>>A buss assignment rotary knob for the track strips with an >>>>alpha display would be groovy also. >>>> >>>>Of course the faders would be motorized, and would update >>>>to the software settings when they were switched. Settings >>>>for the mixers control assignments could be fully overriden >>>>and saved to files for quick recall, and 'written' into >>>>projects. >>>> >>>>That's about it, think Santa can deliver one by Christmas >>>>2001? >>>> >>>>Erich >>>> >>>>
-
Videoon 11/22/1999
clean audio function
Although I'm not sure if Erich was really talking about a compacting solution, "copying all media with project" gives you the ability to get rid off bad takes you didn't delete right after you've recorded them. It's better than nothing, isn't it? Thanks... Charles de Montebello wrote: >>Yeah,but you're still saving the original entire wave files - not the >>justr the portions in use in the project. The function he is talking >>about is a "compacting - where you would assign an amount to leave in >>the handles for editibility... >> >>I hope they do add a compact feature soon, though... >> >>Axel Gutzler wrote: >>>>Am I wrong? There is a way to remove all of the unwanted wave- data. >>>>After you have finished your project use with the "save as" >>>>command "copy all media with project" to save everything (= project >>>>file + the used wave files) in a different location + folder. >>Voila - >>>>there you have your cleaned project. Now you can delete the >>original >>>>folder. >>>> >>>>Erich Grube wrote: >>>>>>Anybody know if Vegas has a function similiar to Cakewalk's >>>>>>clean audio where all the audio events in the projects >>>>>>folder that aren't currently being used by the project (i.e >>>>>>somewhere in the track view) can be deleted. In lieu of >>>>>>this I have been trying to delete bad takes right after >>>>>>they occur but that really destroys momentum. >>>>>> >>>>>>Thanks.
-
Videoon 11/21/1999
clean audio function
Am I wrong? There is a way to remove all of the unwanted wave-data. After you have finished your project use with the "save as" command "copy all media with project" to save everything (= project file + the used wave files) in a different location + folder. Voila - there you have your cleaned project. Now you can delete the original folder. Erich Grube wrote: >>Anybody know if Vegas has a function similiar to Cakewalk's >>clean audio where all the audio events in the projects >>folder that aren't currently being used by the project (i.e >>somewhere in the track view) can be deleted. In lieu of >>this I have been trying to delete bad takes right after >>they occur but that really destroys momentum. >> >>Thanks.
-
Videoon 11/18/1999
Uh.. Gary
No need to read all of the posts. The 2408 works perfectly with VEGAS. Axel Ray Wolff wrote: >>Just got off the phone w/GuitarCenter and, according to >>them, the Layla is no longer made. Seems Echo has gone into >>biz for themselves and no longer supplies Event. Echo has >>no offering of their own yet. Is this just sales BS, or >>should I persist in trying to find one (assuming that's >>what I want)? >> >>If not, I guess I'll be picking up a 2408 in the next day >>or two then. What's up with all the problems I've been >>seeing all these MOTU headers about? Do I really need to go >>back and read every post before I go buy one, in hopes of >>using it w/Vegas? >> >>Peace, >>Ray >>
axel
Offline, Member since 2/2/2001