I'm all a-tingle but I'm sure it's NAGAIS. (Not As Good As It Seems) I have a feature project (AVI, edited with Vegas 5) that was recently viewed by a name editor in the film industry who actually visited my house, watched me run it on the computer, and proposed various changes (for a reasonable fee). He openly wished he could just open my Vegas project files in FCP or Avid because "I could just do the edits myself instead of commenting while you take 20 pages of notes." Also color correction, etc.
I read that AAF, Advanced Authoring Format, is the EDL of the future (near-present?) and just wonder how much metadata information a Vegas 6 AAF export would/should have so that the edits, cross-fades and/or video or audio plugins/effects could be just popped open on an Avid or FCP timeline rather than re-created.
Sounds ambitious to me, but MAN. This would be Sony's trojan horse inside the walls of Avid/FCP and The Industry.
.
I read that AAF, Advanced Authoring Format, is the EDL of the future (near-present?) and just wonder how much metadata information a Vegas 6 AAF export would/should have so that the edits, cross-fades and/or video or audio plugins/effects could be just popped open on an Avid or FCP timeline rather than re-created.
Sounds ambitious to me, but MAN. This would be Sony's trojan horse inside the walls of Avid/FCP and The Industry.
.