Audio Restoration

amendegw wrote on 12/11/2011, 10:24 AM
Anyone interested in helping me with a little project I told a friend I'd help him with?

Here's the background... apparently my friend's grandfather played the banjo in the 1938 Whitetop Mountain Folk Festival. My friend was handed down a recording from a 1938 radio broadcast and wants to give it to his family as a Christmas gift.

I'm not much of an audio expert. I can struggle thru some Sound Forge Stuff, but I'm not particularly good at it.

So, here's my plea: can someone with some audio expertise take a look at this very old, very noisy audio and make it sound better? I realize it's 1938 Radio and it's never going to sound good - but maybe better.

Here it is: JamesVSage.zip

I'd gladly repay anyone who helps with Mercalli Stabilization or Web delivery work (but then again, I'd do that for anyone on this forum anyway).

...Jerry

System Model:     Alienware M18 R1
System:           Windows 11 Pro
Processor:        13th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-13980HX, 2200 Mhz, 24 Core(s), 32 Logical Processor(s)

Installed Memory: 64.0 GB
Display Adapter:  NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (16GB), Nvidia Studio Driver 566.14 Nov 2024
Overclock Off

Display:          1920x1200 240 hertz
Storage (8TB Total):
    OS Drive:       NVMe KIOXIA 4096GB
        Data Drive:     NVMe Samsung SSD 990 PRO 4TB
        Data Drive:     Glyph Blackbox Pro 14TB

Vegas Pro 22 Build 239

Cameras:
Canon R5 Mark II
Canon R3
Sony A9

Comments

paul_w wrote on 12/11/2011, 10:38 AM
Well that got my foot tapping! Great.

Could be wrong but the whole thing sounds low in pitch. Both the intro voice sounds over deep (although he could have really sounded like that) and the banjo sounds out of pitch too. Ending applause too. Anyone else getting that?
Will have go Jerry.

edit: found the song on wiki and it seems the banjo is indeed in the correct pitch, just to my ears there is something wrong and i cant place it. Could be an alternative tuning perhaps, one string tuned down by a tone.

Paul.
Opampman wrote on 12/11/2011, 12:22 PM
I'll give it a try, Jerry. Got a lot of experience in audio restoration so I'll see what I can do.

Kent
paul_w wrote on 12/11/2011, 12:55 PM
This is a first try at it, let me know what you think. Using eq and a tiny bit of spacial expansion.
I have used a gate to reduce noise at the start, that may or may not be a good idea. Thats easy to change.
download http://cuenet.co.uk/sony/BanjoHere[/link]

Paul.
musicvid10 wrote on 12/11/2011, 1:20 PM
I'll give it a go this evening. I don't have Izotope, but I can make "some" improvement in SF7.
johnmeyer wrote on 12/11/2011, 1:49 PM
Here's a result from two passes in iZotope RX2, using the highest quality settings:

iZotope Denoised

I made no attempts to re-time the audio -- if you have Vegas 10 or 11, you can use the marvelous "Elastique" to change speed, with or without pitch correction. Also, I didn't make any attempt to synthesize the "missing" higher end frequencies, something that can sometimes add a little "snap" to something like a banjo. iZotope can be set to do a simple noise gate, but as you'll hear, it also can be set (as it was here) to remove some of the noise even during the playing of the banjo.



amendegw wrote on 12/11/2011, 2:15 PM
Guys - you're wonderful! Keep them coming.

Although I can hear the hiss, pops & noise in the original, I'm completely tone deaf. Pitch? Isn't that something they do in baseball?

In any case, keep these submissions coming. I'll send them all to my friend (who is also a musician) and let him pick the one he likes the best.

I'll report the winner back here. The prize is free Mercalli stabilization & web help (although, as I mentioned in the first post, everyone gets that!).

TIA,
...Jerry

btw: Here's my submission: JamesVSage-Jerry.zip (noise reduction & audio restoration tools in SF9)

System Model:     Alienware M18 R1
System:           Windows 11 Pro
Processor:        13th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-13980HX, 2200 Mhz, 24 Core(s), 32 Logical Processor(s)

Installed Memory: 64.0 GB
Display Adapter:  NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (16GB), Nvidia Studio Driver 566.14 Nov 2024
Overclock Off

Display:          1920x1200 240 hertz
Storage (8TB Total):
    OS Drive:       NVMe KIOXIA 4096GB
        Data Drive:     NVMe Samsung SSD 990 PRO 4TB
        Data Drive:     Glyph Blackbox Pro 14TB

Vegas Pro 22 Build 239

Cameras:
Canon R5 Mark II
Canon R3
Sony A9

paul_w wrote on 12/11/2011, 2:19 PM
Lots of choices - always good!

here's another, similar to the first one but i removed compression, it didnt need any! This has a bit more depth. Right im done...Good luck.
http://cuenet.co.uk/sony/banjo%20EQ%20and%20gate.zipEQ and Gate[/link]

Paul.
john_dennis wrote on 12/11/2011, 2:30 PM
The repeat of the introduction doesn't sound like natural echo or reverb, but rather like "print through" from a previous tape wrap. Sounds like a tape recording from a record. Did you get the sound as a tape? If it was transfered to tape long ago, the tape could have stretched a bit when being played on some old drives, slowing the music down a bit. There seems to be a fair amount of high frequency noise like tape hiss or the noise from high gain amplifiers.
john_dennis wrote on 12/11/2011, 2:39 PM
@paul_w

Good work on gating out the noise on the music in the first submission! On the introduction it was a little disconcerting to hear all background noise completely disappear. I expect to here some noise in an old piece.
paul_w wrote on 12/11/2011, 2:43 PM
Im using EQ alone to repair the music, and reduce hiss. But yes i agree, the gate is a bit extreme and goes to zero noise!. Will do a version without gate, so then it should sound more authentic.

Paul.
larry-peter wrote on 12/11/2011, 2:47 PM
http://www.powerplantonline.com/Sage/JamesVSage_RX.zip

Hope I inserted the link correctly. See if this helps. Got rid of a lot of noise and the print-through on the voice introduction. I did my best to not alter the overall timbre of the performance, but added a bit of multi-band compression to bring out the attack from the banjo skin. A very nice performance.

Larry
farss wrote on 12/11/2011, 3:10 PM
Given the vintage it was probably recorded by directly cutting a disk, tape really didn't happen until the 1940s, I think wire recorders might have been around in 1938 but were not all that common. Given the vintage of the recording it's in very good condition, I've had to deal with much worse, like a transfer from acetate done with the wrong sized needle that must have been bottoming out onto the aluminium base, yuck, yuck, yuck.
Probably the "echo" is from print through, if so then at least the tape was wound the right way for storage.

I was going to run it through iZotopes Rx but as JM has already done that no point two of us doing the same thing. The main thing I'd see as vital is getting rid of the low frequency hum. I doubt that used to worry anyone decades ago, the amplifiiers and speakers that most could afford back then couldn't reproduce it. Today with many people having "subs" it is can be really offensive.

Bob.
Opampman wrote on 12/11/2011, 3:18 PM
Jerry - Didn't try to do anything with speed. This is with noise removal, vacuum tube declipping, and virtual valve enhancement. Didn't try to do anything with the speed. Sounds like some acetate cut noise and there was definitely a tape involved somewhere as you can hear the phasing from track to track as the tape weaves over the heads. Hope I got the link right.

http://honkytonkcountrytv.com/page20.html
johnmeyer wrote on 12/11/2011, 3:24 PM
atom12,

I was blown away by the quality of what you did. Which tool did you use?
paul_w wrote on 12/11/2011, 3:42 PM
Agreed, sounds like a cut disc then tranfered to mag tape at some point, we here crackles 'and ' print through.

Right i was going to try a total gate removal version but changed my mind. This is still gated as before but i mixed in some sampled genuine background noise during the gated sections, at a reduced level of course. Should stop the gate sounding like an off switch!

http://cuenet.co.uk/sony/banjo%20EQ%20with%20gate%20and%20background.zipGate, EQ and added background[/link]

Paul.
paul_w wrote on 12/11/2011, 3:42 PM
Opampman, can't open your link here.

Paul.
paul_w wrote on 12/11/2011, 4:11 PM
Yup, somethings up with the pitch:

"Arkansas Traveler" Annie & Mac Old Time Music Moment[/link]

He's using a capo on the 2nd fret and the recording is a whole tone lower than this.

Paul.
Opampman wrote on 12/11/2011, 4:12 PM
Hmmmm.works fine for me in IE and Chrome.

Kent
amendegw wrote on 12/11/2011, 4:34 PM
"I was blown away by the quality of what you did. Which tool did you use?"atom12, Whoa!! I'm also blown away. What's the secret?

...Jerry

System Model:     Alienware M18 R1
System:           Windows 11 Pro
Processor:        13th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-13980HX, 2200 Mhz, 24 Core(s), 32 Logical Processor(s)

Installed Memory: 64.0 GB
Display Adapter:  NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (16GB), Nvidia Studio Driver 566.14 Nov 2024
Overclock Off

Display:          1920x1200 240 hertz
Storage (8TB Total):
    OS Drive:       NVMe KIOXIA 4096GB
        Data Drive:     NVMe Samsung SSD 990 PRO 4TB
        Data Drive:     Glyph Blackbox Pro 14TB

Vegas Pro 22 Build 239

Cameras:
Canon R5 Mark II
Canon R3
Sony A9

paul_w wrote on 12/11/2011, 4:43 PM
And my final pitch corrected version.
http://cuenet.co.uk/sony/banjopitch corrected version[/link]

Notice how the intro voice now sounds correct, it was too low before. And of course the music is now in the correct pitch.

Paul.
larry-peter wrote on 12/11/2011, 4:46 PM
John, Jerry - Thanks. Audio was my first love. I used Izotope RX for broadband noise removal, then went to Sound Forge. Waves C4 for a bit of long attack compression at 600-1kHz to bring up the banjo skin and then used Izotope's Multi-band Expander to put a roll-off on 4 bands so the noise would fade with the decay of the audio. Altering the threshold for each band keeps it from sounding like a gate, as the highs roll off first , then mids, then lows.

Hope it can work for you. Got me out of the editing suite for a little bit today.

Larry

I also will add that Sony/Sonic Foundry Noise Reduction can sometimes do a better job with fewer artifacts than Izotope, but if you have a source with much wow/flutter it can lose the noise profile at times. Izotope seems more forgiving in that respect.
paul_w wrote on 12/11/2011, 4:59 PM
Nice work Larry, you really got rid of the noise.
Hearing some phasing or wooshing in the audio, probably fine for TV but on the studio monitors its quite evident. Could that be supressed further? But hey, overall, its impressive. Nice job.

Paul.
musicvid10 wrote on 12/11/2011, 4:59 PM
Yup, atom12's restoration beats anything I was able to do in SF7
In addition to wideband NR I'm amazed at the amount of distortion in the 1.5-3 kHz range he was able to remove while preserving the (few) audio frequencies that exist.
Congratulations!

Of course, Jerry's already done some really nice Mercalli stabilization for me, so I still owe him one . . .

In case Santa's listening, I want VisLM, Izotope, and Mercalli, in any order.

amendegw wrote on 12/11/2011, 4:59 PM
Paul/Larry,

I really don't know %$#@ about pitch. Larry's clarity of the track sounds better to me, but Paul's pitch change makes the banjo sound better. Do others agree?

Larry, can you apply Paul's pitch correction to your work?

Am I making any sense at all?

...Jerry

System Model:     Alienware M18 R1
System:           Windows 11 Pro
Processor:        13th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-13980HX, 2200 Mhz, 24 Core(s), 32 Logical Processor(s)

Installed Memory: 64.0 GB
Display Adapter:  NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (16GB), Nvidia Studio Driver 566.14 Nov 2024
Overclock Off

Display:          1920x1200 240 hertz
Storage (8TB Total):
    OS Drive:       NVMe KIOXIA 4096GB
        Data Drive:     NVMe Samsung SSD 990 PRO 4TB
        Data Drive:     Glyph Blackbox Pro 14TB

Vegas Pro 22 Build 239

Cameras:
Canon R5 Mark II
Canon R3
Sony A9