Comments

vicmilt wrote on 4/30/2003, 6:30 PM
That's called rotoscoping - very work intensive and it needs specialized software, although there are rumors that Vegas may have suitable plug-in's coming.
Do a search on Rotoscoping and find out all about it.
TheHappyFriar wrote on 4/30/2003, 11:34 PM
I did something like this once. I had to export all the frames to png's, then go into photoshop and edit each picture individualy. Took about 2 hours for a 5 second clip (was a big area, little detail).

I should mention, though, that i got the look I wanted and it was worth it.
dust wrote on 5/1/2003, 1:58 AM
Hmm, I'm not sure if I understood the problem completely... but principially you can make a mask for a moving object as well, as long as the background differs enough from the object. You can apply a "Chroma Key" filter and pick the background color (there are already presets for blue screens), and use its "Show mask only" checkbox. Probably you need to play a bit with thresholds and maybe add contrast&brightness. After rendering, such a clip could then be used as mask for your original clip.
mikkie wrote on 5/1/2003, 8:12 AM
You might be able to get away with using a mask or masks to get rid of most of the background, then try chromakey, then maybe a bit of manual touchup.

In some software you set up vector paths around your object, & it can get fairly involved, but then again so is manually retouching every frame.
kameronj wrote on 5/1/2003, 1:21 PM
Yeah...I guess what I was looking for was doing vector paths around objects like in Boris Red....which I can't afford! :-0

Other than that...I guess doing frame-x-frame paint out is the next best. Time consuming, but it probably is the best method for a shot after the fact.
kameronj wrote on 5/2/2003, 12:08 PM
Question...how did you do the export to PNGs?