BluRay/PS3 update-more

vicmilt wrote on 12/17/2007, 7:25 PM
So I've been playing around a lot with Vegas 8 and the PS3.

So here's some interesting news -
the problem... my movie is 75 minutes.

When I went to burn the BluRay from Vegas it complained that the disc ( a double density 8.4 gig ) was not big enough, as the estimated size of the project would be 8.9 gigs.

I believed the estimate - timid choice.

In the end, I burned the BluRay to a hard drive at 15MPS. It ended up only being 8.2 gigs. I burned the disc and it works great - from first frame to last.

So, FWIW give it a try.
BTW - the HiDef footage is amazing - am SO happy.

best,
v

Comments

Laurence wrote on 12/17/2007, 7:37 PM
Vic:

Just to make sure that we understand you correctly: you burned 75 minutes of 15 mbps AVCHD footage onto a regular DVD+R. Is that correct? Wow that is cool!
Laurence wrote on 12/17/2007, 7:39 PM
By the way, you should also be able to burn the contents of that disc to a subdirectory on the PS3 hard drive (either the internal or an external) and play it just as well.
Laurence wrote on 12/17/2007, 7:42 PM
Also, I would take that disc to your local electronics superstore and try it in a bunch of Blu-ray players. I'll bet it plays in everything but the Samsungs.
4eyes wrote on 12/17/2007, 8:07 PM
Is Vegas making an avchd disk or a BDMV disk (without menus).
If it's a BDMV disk without menus there's only one blu-ray player I've heard of that will play the BDMV format from a dvd.
AVCHD should be no problem.
Laurence wrote on 12/17/2007, 8:41 PM
OK I missunderstood. If you burned the disc from Vegas it is Blu-ray format disc on regular DVD+R, not an AVCHD disc like I thought. I've had zero luck getting that kind of disc to playback on a PS3. Maybe things have changed on one of the recent PS3 updates.
rtbond wrote on 12/18/2007, 4:36 AM
>. I'll bet it plays in everything but the Samsungs.

FYI, a BDMV formated DVD+R disc (both single and dual layer) burned from the Vegas 8 Pro timeline using H.264/AVC encoding works just fine in my Samsung BD-P1200.

--Rob

Rob Bond

My System Info:

  • Vegas Pro 22 Build 194
  • OS: Windows 11.0 Home (64-bit), Version: 10.0.26100 Build 26100
  • Processor: i9-10940X CPU @ 3.30GHz (14 core)
  • Physical memory: 64GB (Corsair Vengeance LPX 64GB (2 x 32GB) DDR4 DRAM 3200MHz C16 memory kit)
  • Motherboard Model: MSI x299 Creator (MS-7B96)
  • GPU: EVGA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER XC ULTRA (Studio Driver Version =  536.40)
  • Storage: Dual Samsung 970 EVO 1TB SSD (boot and Render); WDC WD4004FZWX, 7200 RPM (media)
  • Primary Display: Dell UltraSharp 27, U2723QE, 4K monitor with 98% DCI-P3 and DisplayHDR 400 with Dell Display Manager
  • Secondary Display: LG 32UK550-B, entry-level 4k/HDR-10 level monitor, @95% DCI-P3 coverage
Laurence wrote on 12/18/2007, 5:03 AM
Yeah, it's the AVCHD disc format that the BD-P1200 has trouble with. The Samsungs used to play that format, but took it off a couple of firmware updates ago.
vicmilt wrote on 12/18/2007, 12:59 PM
Laurence -
I'm sort of burned out - especially behind all the various acronyms, so I'll just repeat my experience.

1 - Rendered a 75 minute Blu-Ray to HD directly from the Vegas 8 timeline - Tools>Burn disc>Blu-Ray disc
2 - Used default 15MPS template
3 - It bitched about "Not enough room on your disc" for the double density, estimating it was going to need 8.9gig.
4 - It only really needed 8.2 gig.
5 - Using the same links in Vegas 8, I burned the disc to a standard "double-density" DVD+R DL
6 - Works perfectly in my PS3 under Video>BDMV>STREAM

Won't be able to test it anywhere else for a while.

For those with bigger films, see my other link - the 4x Sony Blu-Ray burner is here! That'll take discs up to 50Gigs - but they cost some money, for sure.

v
Laurence wrote on 12/18/2007, 1:13 PM
OK so you didn't get the menus or immediate playback either. You had to go to the folder and play back the referenced data file.

If you render to the equivalent AVCHD format from Vegas, you can author to AVCHD disc from Ulead MF6+ HD. The video quality will look exactly the same but you'll be able to do menus and not have to sift through directories. The AVCHD disc done this way will play perfectly in all Blu-ray players with menus except for Samsung models which for some strange reason removed this feature a couple of firmware updates ago.
4eyes wrote on 12/18/2007, 2:31 PM
I also like the avchd route (MF6+) because each video will playback one after another.
When playing videos on a PS3 in data mode it's one video at a time, although they have added playlists for music & photos.
megabit wrote on 12/18/2007, 3:11 PM
How exactly do you make an AVCHD disk?

AMD TR 2990WX CPU | MSI X399 CARBON AC | 64GB RAM@XMP2933  | 2x RTX 2080Ti GPU | 4x 3TB WD Black RAID0 media drive | 3x 1TB NVMe RAID0 cache drive | SSD SATA system drive | AX1600i PSU | Decklink 12G Extreme | Samsung UHD reference monitor (calibrated)

Laurence wrote on 12/18/2007, 6:59 PM
It's one of the options from Ulead Movie Factory 6 plus HD with the extra HD authoring plugin. It also authors regular Bluray on BD-R and HD DVD on either HD DVD-R or DVD-R.
4eyes wrote on 12/18/2007, 7:10 PM
I have been using Ulead MovieFactory 6 Plus with an additional HD-Add-On pack ($20.00).
I render my avchd/h264 videos from the timeline in Vegas, then insert them into that authoring program, because they are compliant they are passed through the ulead encoder and multi-plexed onto a dvd (no re-encoding). The AVCHD disk creation doesn't have extensive custom menus.
The Blu-Ray disk module does and will allow you to mix avc/h264 or mpeg2 on a blu-ray disk.

I've previously posted how to export avchd/h264 compliant videos from Vegas to use in other authoring applications.
megabit wrote on 12/19/2007, 1:32 AM
4eyes, I somehow can't find this earlier post of yours on how you export avchd/h.264 videos from Vegas; could you point me to the thread/post? I'd like to try this against my "regular" BD burning results... Thanks!

AMD TR 2990WX CPU | MSI X399 CARBON AC | 64GB RAM@XMP2933  | 2x RTX 2080Ti GPU | 4x 3TB WD Black RAID0 media drive | 3x 1TB NVMe RAID0 cache drive | SSD SATA system drive | AX1600i PSU | Decklink 12G Extreme | Samsung UHD reference monitor (calibrated)

Laurence wrote on 12/19/2007, 1:43 PM
IMHO, HD video on regular DVD+-Rs (in either HD DVD or Blu-ray compatible AVCHD format) is a good match. The video looks great and you can get up to about 75 minutes of playback time (thanks Vic for updating our estimates).

That isn't to say that there isn't still an advantage to using BD-R discs. There is, but not for HDV which is only 1440 x 1080i x 25 mbps to begin with. Now if you have one of the new Sony EX1 cameras and want to present 1920 x 1080p at a higher bitrate, BD-R will let you do this, but for most of us with other cameras, DVD+-Rs are really quite adequate.
DSCalef wrote on 12/19/2007, 8:20 PM
I am thinking of playing around with HD Blu-ray disk burning to learn what it is all about and so that I am ready when somebody wants the real thing.

My question is, is all this buring talked about in this thread done with standard DVD burners and not Blu-ray burners?

Thanks folks. This information, this whole forum, is very very instructive and useful.

vicmilt wrote on 12/19/2007, 8:30 PM
Yup!

That's the exciting thing about it all.

Using your standard DVD burner, Vegas 8 (as above) and standard DVD media, you can burn full BluRay HD videos - 32 minutes on "regular" DV or 75 minutes on DVD+R DL double density discs.
vicmilt wrote on 12/19/2007, 8:30 PM
Yup!

That's the exciting thing about it all.

Using your standard DVD burner, Vegas 8 (as above) and standard DVD media, you can burn full BluRay HD videos - 32 minutes on "regular" DV or 75 minutes on DVD+R DL double density discs.
RexA wrote on 12/25/2007, 12:39 AM
"Using your standard DVD burner, Vegas 8 (as above) and standard DVD media, you can burn full BluRay HD videos - 32 minutes on "regular" DV or 75 minutes on DVD+R DL double density discs."

I'm a bit behind on the technology. The "DL" part means dual layer or two layers on the CD, no? So the "standard DVD burner" has to support dual layer, doesn't it?

Just trying to clarify. My DVD technology is several years old and I don't think knows anything about dual layers. I need more than I have for this good stuff, don't I?