HI Vern!
Thats a good idea and track-eq does not really use cpu-power.
But it would be nice to have this easier.

I ordered Amulet already but that will still not solve the problem
perfectly. A Master L-R would be really great.

Vern-thanks for your tipp.

Vern Cooper wrote:
>>I've tried setting up projects with a "fake" master bus by setting
up
>>the project with one master bus, and then creating effect busses
for
>>the groups of tracks I wanted to sum, and setting all effects
faders
>>to pre. If I didn't want a effect on a bus, I'd put in the Vegas
>>track EQ, which shouldn't use any CPU bandwidth if no bands are
>>activated.
>>
>>This had a few setbacks, the main one being that if I wanted to add
>>an effect to one track and then add that effected track to a bus, I
>>couldn't do it. But now that the Amulet plugin lets me use ASIO
>>plugins as track effects, this isn't much of a problem.
>>
>>Walterius Till wrote:
>>>>Thanks Peter your totally right. i apollogize that i acused vegas
>>to
>>>>have mono-sends.
>>>>So thats the solution for now.
>>>>It would be really great to have a Masterbus for controlling the
sum
>>>>of the busses and to have a project already run through
>>Maseringfxes.
>>>>So thanks again.
>>>>God bless you.
>>>>walter
>>>>
>>>>Peter Haller wrote:
>>>>>>Assignable FX are stereo. (Actually all FX in Vegas are treated
>>as
>>>>>>stereo.)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>What makes you to say they are not?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Vegas actually treats all busses as sub busses. Your audio
>>>>>>hardware/save as 'file' is considered the master bus. All main
>>>>>>busses are peers, and therefore can't be assigned to each
other.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I could see having a "Master-L/R" bus that could have the sub
>>>>busses
>>>>>>routed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Peter
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Walterius Till wrote:
>>>>>>>>Thanks Matt!
>>>>>>>>thats o.k., but for example: if i have 4 tracks with choir
>>(mono)
>>>>>>and
>>>>>>>>i would like to pan it full stereo, and compress it(together
in
>>a
>>>>>>>>stereocompressor) and send this into a reverb, i found out
that
>>>>>>this
>>>>>>>>is not possible in assignable-fx because ass.fx is not stereo.
>>>>>>>>maybe you have again ideas.
>>>>>>>>i can only suggest to set bus-fx pre or you can route one bus
>>>>into
>>>>>>>>another, like a real mixer with subgroups and a masterfeder.
>>>>>>>>thanks a lot for help
>>>>>>>>walter
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Matt Logan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>Walterius,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I would recommend routing the track outputs you wish
to
>>>>>>>>compress
>>>>>>>>>>through an FX SEND instead of routing them directly to a
>>Bus.
>>>>>>You
>>>>>>>>>>can create a new FX Send by either clicking on the “Insert
>>>>>>>>Assignable
>>>>>>>>>>FX” button in the Mixer toolbar, or by dropping plug-ins
into
>>>>an
>>>>>>>>>>empty area of the mixer. To assign each track’s output to
>>the
>>>>FX
>>>>>>>>>>Send, click on the pan/FX assign popup to the left of the
>>>>bottom
>>>>>>>>>>fader on the track and select “FX 1”. Now set the FX 1
send
>>>>>>level
>>>>>>>>to
>>>>>>>>>>your taste. Right –clicking on this fader allows you to
set
>>>>the
>>>>>>>>send
>>>>>>>>>>a pre or post volume fader. I would recommend setting this
>>to
>>>>>>pre-
>>>>>>>>>>fader and then setting the track output volume to minimum.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>The purpose of Bus FX is to allow final limiting/dithering
>>just
>>>>>>>>>>before sending the audio to your sound card. Dithering in
>>>>>>>>particular
>>>>>>>>>>makes little sense as a pre-bus-fader effect because as you
>>>>>>adjust
>>>>>>>>>>the Bus Volume, you would also be adjusting the dither
volume.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Walterius Till wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>when i want to compress a signal in a bus then i want to
>>>>>>>>>>>>have the signal processed constantly and have volume-
>>>>>>>>>>>>control with the fader.
>>>>>>>>>>>>i hate to set the volume with the compressors output.
>>>>>>>>>>>>please help!!!!