Can't Get Aspect Ratio

Hellot wrote on 12/20/2009, 7:00 PM
Hi,
My DV camcorder, a Canon ZR700, can record in true widescreen 16:9 format. The problem is I can't get it to display or render in 16:9 once I import it into Vegas. I have Vegas 6 by the way. I'll tell you the basic steps I take to edit my videos, in case I'm missing something.

I upload my widescreen recorded video via firewire onto my computer. I always just upload through Windows Movie Maker because it's what I first used and was simple. I have a 16:9 aspect ratio set in Windows Movie Maker. I then take the saved video and import it into my project. I use the NTSC DV Widescreen template. No matter what template I use however, it never displays in 16:9, depending on what template, black bars on the sides, of varying widths appear. Checking simulate device aspect ratio doesn't help either. I don't want to crop it. I know my camera records in true 16:9, no cropping or masking. Before importing my video into vegas, it plays in 16:9.

I really appreciate any help,
Thanks

Comments

musicvid10 wrote on 12/20/2009, 7:22 PM
Windows Movie Maker captures of DV-AVI are nonstandard structure. This can be easily demonstrated by running GSpot on a capture.

I cannot even open WMM captured files in Vegas on my Vista machine.

If the Sony capture utility is not to your liking, Scenealyzer will also do the job. I regularly capture "fake" or true 16:9 DV with either.
Former user wrote on 12/20/2009, 7:31 PM
You should be able to click on the file properties in Vegas and manually change the Aspect Ratio. But why are you capturing in Movie Maker?

Dave T2
Hellot wrote on 12/20/2009, 9:05 PM
@ musicvid: So you're saying the problem is because I'm capturing with Windows Movie Maker? I only use it to transfer the tapes onto my computer. The files are saved as WMV so they open in Vegas.

@Dave T2: How so? I've used different templates in the file properties, I've set the simulate device aspect ratio feature and I don't want to crop anything. I just use Windows Movie Maker to capture because it was easier for me at first and now I've just become accustomed to it. I should try capturing with Vegas again. Last time I did, the quality wasn't as good. It sounds weird I know. A crappy little pre-installed program compared to a professional editing program. I'll have to try it again to describe the exact flaws, but I recall it being a little more pixelated and having some missing frames. Maybe I did something wrong.
John_Cline wrote on 12/20/2009, 9:31 PM
"Windows Movie Maker to capture because it was easier for me at first and now I've just become accustomed to it."

You've become accustomed to doing it wrong. Windows Movie Maker isn't actually doing a bit-for-bit identical transfer of the video from the tapes to the hard drive, it's transcoding the video and audio and that causes an undeniable and unavoidable loss of quality. WMM captures as a highly compressed Windows Media file and the file format doesn't handle aspect ratios correctly.

In order to get the maximum quality and the correct aspect ratio, you really must be using the Vegas capture utility to capture via Firewire from your camcorder. When you shoot, the video gets compressed in the camcorder and recorded to tape in the DV format. When you capture the tape using the Vegas utility, you are just copying the data directly from the tape to the hard drive with no loss whatsoever. It's bit-for-bit identical to what's on the tape. Vegas also reads the widescreen flag from the camcorder and correctly embeds the widescreen flag in the header of the resulting .AVI on the hard drive.

"Last time I did, the quality wasn't as good. It sounds weird I know."

It sounds weird because it's unlikely to be true. If done correctly, video captured via Vegas will be vastly better than using WMM.
Hellot wrote on 12/20/2009, 10:40 PM
Okay thanks. Any tips on the optimal way to do it?
farss wrote on 12/20/2009, 11:02 PM
I think you need to right click the media and change the pixel aspect ratio. This should work pretty much regardless of how it was captured. All that's gone wrong is the 16:9 flag is missing or Vegas cannot read it.

Bob.
John_Cline wrote on 12/20/2009, 11:24 PM
There is no "optimal" way to do it. Just read the manual on Vegas Capture. It isn't rocket science.
Grazie wrote on 12/20/2009, 11:50 PM
It's dead easy in Vegas VidCap. AND you can do it directly from within VEgas and after you have the clips already in Project Media - Done!

Bob? What's the point? You then have to change each and every Media setting! No, recapture thru Vegas - DONE!

Eh? Actually, does the PD150 do native 16x9? Or is it videoed with guides and THEN you have to crop/cut it to 16x9 - dunno?

Anyways, I video in Canon 16x9 mode, and VidCap straight into Vegas. Now editing a piece I did in 16x9 now. All the clips came in thru' Vegas VidCap and all have the 1.4568 (PAL DV Widescreen) PAR already set.

Grazie
farss wrote on 12/21/2009, 3:43 AM
" No, recapture thru Vegas - DONE!"

If you're lucky.
16:9 flags oftenly got 'lost' even capturing with Vegas.

"Actually, does the PD150 do native 16x9? Or is it videoed with guides and THEN you have to crop/cut it to 16x9 - dunno?"

I don't think the PD150 does native 16:9, well the PAL one doesn't. I have heard that the NTSC version does but I've never had one to confirm. We have a 16:9 anamorphic lens for the PD150 and that's the right way to get 16:9 out of the PD150 at least in PAL land.

PS, you can change all the media to 16:9 in a few clicks.

Bob.
musicvid10 wrote on 12/21/2009, 7:54 AM
Never lost flags capturing in Vegas, but I use Scenalyzer 90% of the time.

No need to beat a dead horse, but WMV captured in Movie Maker is not a good starting point.
Hellot wrote on 12/21/2009, 10:33 AM
@ farss: thanks that definitely helps. It works for my needs, but I'm told that it's better to capture with Vegas.

@ musicvid: Why is capture through movie maker so bad? I captured through vegas and my aspect ratio problem gets fixed, but one tape took practically 10 gigabytes of space up. Why? Also, the main deterrent in the first place was that in the preview window, even on the "best" setting, the media is really pixelated. That doesn't happen with anything else I do, so I got the impression that the media itself just wasn't captured very well. It should render just as well right? Also, is there a way to not have Vegas separate my media into clips? It's trivial but I prefer to do it myself. What about dropped frames? I had 459 dropped frames, which confused me. It was capturing some blank tape though, so is that the cause?
musicvid10 wrote on 12/21/2009, 10:49 AM
I can't answer your questions about Movie Maker. It doesn't work for me, and the AVI files are not compliant. That's all I know.

As stated, Vegas Vidcap does not alter your original data. It is a pixel-for-pixel transfer. If there is something wrong in the preview, and you captured directly from the camera with a firewire connection, then the problem lies somewhere else.

You have to have video to capture. Blank tape does not have frames. VidCap will create a new clip every time there is a timecode reset. This is necessary to prevent duplicate timecode on the same event. Since most consumer cameras do not have freerun timecode sync this is unavoidable. Good luck!
Terry Esslinger wrote on 12/21/2009, 11:49 AM
<<Also, is there a way to not have Vegas separate my media into clips?>>

There is a setting in preferences that will turn off this option.

<<but one tape took practically 10 gigabytes of space up. Why>>

DV.avi is about 13 GB per hour
Hellot wrote on 12/21/2009, 12:13 PM
I started another thread considering space if you want to check it out. But why does it use so much space and is there a way to reduce the amount of space without greatly reducing the quality? I'm curious how people store all their footage if it takes up so much room.
musicvid10 wrote on 12/21/2009, 12:18 PM
1) DV-AVI is 25Mbs for the video bitrate. Type this into a Google Search and it will do the math for you:
25 Mb x 3600 to GB
2) Better quality = bigger files. Smaller files = worse quality. There is absolutely no magic involved.
3) People buy additional hard drives to capture and store video. They are cheap.

For more help understanding basic video concepts, you will want to read this tutorial completely. It directly answers every question you have had up to this point:

http://www.sonycreativesoftware.com/forums/ShowMessage.asp?ForumID=12&MessageID=660127
Hellot wrote on 12/21/2009, 2:43 PM
Thank you.