Comments

Stiffler wrote on 12/27/2002, 12:28 AM
I'm assuming you are capturing from a Digital camcorder which to my knowlage, you can only capture as (dv) avi.

The large files are one of the reasons to add a second hard drive just for storage.

I looked at the website for video explosion, and the screen shots look exactly like Video Factory. I didn't find any links to this site, but it looks like Sonic Foundry is selling this under another name or something.




IanG wrote on 12/27/2002, 3:13 AM
Conversion to a different format happens when you render your video, not when you capture it. It's possible to work with compressed media, but it's not a good idea.

Ian G.
Grazie wrote on 12/27/2002, 4:49 AM
Really,I've found, that to have at least another dedicated "video-activity" drive has been the way to go. Making the single c: drive do all the work is asking a lot of it. Don't forget you have the system files AND the VF files on the C: drive. NLE work is a major demand on all resources. Now, apart from the above, placing large lumps of DV on the C: drive does take up a lot of space. If you are running a cache drive option - say 3gb - this will "muscle-in" on any "reserve" space you have. Truly, investigate the option for a separate drive. FOr example, I now have a 60gb, 80gb and recently attached 2 x 120gb drives = 380gb in total - not including the C: drive - yes?

I realise these "extra" devices are an unexpected expense. However, prices for extra drives are tumbling down.

Cheers

Grazie
Stiffler wrote on 12/27/2002, 2:01 PM
In my opinion all computers should have a second drive for storage, even if you are not doing NLE.

With broadband, people are downloading a ton of stuff, MP3's, videos, etc. Filling up their HD and slowing the system down.

One thing that I do, is whenever I download a new driver, program, or something like it, I send it to my (D) drive (then install it to my C drive). That way if something happens to my main HD, I have all the drivers, or programs right there, ready to reinstall.