It all depends on what YOUR needs are. Are you doing video? audio?
both? What do you need out of the program in terms of functionality?
If you do multitrack recording with a lot of overdubs and need tight
synch, Vegas won't cut it. There are workarounds to the limtations
(they have been EXTENSIBLY discussed in this forum), but it can't
take the abuse inherent to everyday studio work. On the other hand, it
is an excellent program for editing and mixing. As always, it is a
problem of matching the user needs to the software's features.
Investigate, act PERTINENT questions, and you'll make the right
decision. Good luck.
Victor.
Patrick McCormick wrote:
>>Would welcome any thoughts about this product good and bad,
>>thanks you for your time.
>>Patrick
>>
Our studio has been using Vegas Video day in day out;project no.7
done with
it.Vegas Pro was ok and to be honest it really should be replaced by
Vegas Video due to better things updated in VV!!I would suggest
getting Vegas Video or waiting to check out Vegas Audio which will be
out in september.We do radio spots solo artists,bands,and many voice
overdubs as
well for childrens books from some interesting clients and love the
easy use of it on the whole.They love the marker cues for their in
the voxroom sight guides!
You will have a different outlook on punching in though.I do like the
way it works as far as tighter punches compared to Sawpro which is a
hell of a program in it's own!
No midi.Just depends on your needs.We have had great results and will
continue to use it.This is our thoughts as far as actual everyday
studio use.
Try the demo if interested.
Thanx Patrick!
Patrick McCormick wrote:
>>Would welcome any thoughts about this product good and bad,
>>thanks you for your time.
>>Patrick
>>
I like the ease of use with all the power. I'm using a PII/333 with
128MB of RAM and it works really well. I've tried Cakewalk Pro
Audio, Cubase VST, SAW Pro, and Ensoniq PARIS. They all do something
the others don't. Personally, I just like how VV feels and performs.
Good luck,
Ron
Patrick McCormick wrote:
>>Would welcome any thoughts about this product good and bad,
>>thanks you for your time.
>>Patrick
>>