Hi.
I made a 3D project from 2 HDV files for testing and comparing
preview and rendering speeds with different CPU-s and GPU-s.
It's just 95MB.
You can download from here:
http://www.relaxvideo.hu/3d-project.zip
After unpacking you have 3 files:
- separate left and right video
- and the project file. Open it!
You will see 3 part on the timeline, the first is just the 3D video without any FX, the 2nd have some color correction, the 3rd also a levels filter and CC. Project is set to Anaglyph Red/Cyan.
Set your preview settings to Preview (full), fire up your GPU acceleration if supported and see how much FPS do you get when you play the timeline.
My current system is a 3.3GHz dual core cpu with 4GB RAM, Geforce 7600GT, XP SP3 and Vegas10.
Tomorrow i change my video card, install Win7 and Vegas11 so now i can only share my result without GPU acceleration.
But i like to see other's results.
Oh, one interesting thing: in Options/Preferences under video tab, if i set "maximum number of rendering threads" to 1 i get better result, than with 2 (but i have a dualcore cpu) So why is this? Vegas isn't great for multi processors? Isn't optimized?
So, my Playback fps result on
timeline part1: 18
timeline part2: 5,5
timeline part3: 4,7
I tried also some rendering, always timeline part2 with the color corrected clip!
Select the 15 sec part and render to:
Mainconcept AVC 1440x1080 25interlaced, 24mbit, Best quality, Stereoscopic mode: left only
2min 14sec
Sony AVCHD 1440x1080 50i template 15mbit, AC3 audio, Best quality, Stereoscopic mode: left only
1min 12sec
And finally render to 3D MVC file:
Sony AVC/MVC
MVC 1920x1080-24p template, 25mbit, Best quality
3min 30sec
As you can see, with my 3.3GHz CPU i need 14x realtime for 3D MVC rendering, this is too much. I'm interested which GPU can shorten this time a lot?
Thank you if you share your GPU accelerated results!
Marton
I made a 3D project from 2 HDV files for testing and comparing
preview and rendering speeds with different CPU-s and GPU-s.
It's just 95MB.
You can download from here:
http://www.relaxvideo.hu/3d-project.zip
After unpacking you have 3 files:
- separate left and right video
- and the project file. Open it!
You will see 3 part on the timeline, the first is just the 3D video without any FX, the 2nd have some color correction, the 3rd also a levels filter and CC. Project is set to Anaglyph Red/Cyan.
Set your preview settings to Preview (full), fire up your GPU acceleration if supported and see how much FPS do you get when you play the timeline.
My current system is a 3.3GHz dual core cpu with 4GB RAM, Geforce 7600GT, XP SP3 and Vegas10.
Tomorrow i change my video card, install Win7 and Vegas11 so now i can only share my result without GPU acceleration.
But i like to see other's results.
Oh, one interesting thing: in Options/Preferences under video tab, if i set "maximum number of rendering threads" to 1 i get better result, than with 2 (but i have a dualcore cpu) So why is this? Vegas isn't great for multi processors? Isn't optimized?
So, my Playback fps result on
timeline part1: 18
timeline part2: 5,5
timeline part3: 4,7
I tried also some rendering, always timeline part2 with the color corrected clip!
Select the 15 sec part and render to:
Mainconcept AVC 1440x1080 25interlaced, 24mbit, Best quality, Stereoscopic mode: left only
2min 14sec
Sony AVCHD 1440x1080 50i template 15mbit, AC3 audio, Best quality, Stereoscopic mode: left only
1min 12sec
And finally render to 3D MVC file:
Sony AVC/MVC
MVC 1920x1080-24p template, 25mbit, Best quality
3min 30sec
As you can see, with my 3.3GHz CPU i need 14x realtime for 3D MVC rendering, this is too much. I'm interested which GPU can shorten this time a lot?
Thank you if you share your GPU accelerated results!
Marton