Finished (i think) first while Vegas 8 project.

TheHappyFriar wrote on 10/21/2007, 10:54 PM
Saturday morning/afternoon I headed out (with my PC) to a client to edit with them. @ 12:30 I arrived. @ 1:30 we started editing. I've got an AMD X2 4200, 1gb DDR.

Between 1:30 & midnight, we edited only stopping to eat once. 1 crash the entire time. think it was because I had two instances open & one was being used to rip off a CD (thanks sony for adding cd-info stuff!). The one with the cd-ripper open crashed but the other instance never did (yeah for separate processes!)

We used generated media (protype, text, credit roll, solid color & noise texture). No issues at all (protype was exceptionally useful & so was the credit roll). The woman I was working for has a normal editor who had a heart attack (he's still alive & will be ok, just recovering & she needed it done) & a friend of hers/client of mine recommended me. The other editor did everything via tapes & a linear editing system. she was amazed at what I could do, quickly. What took days on the linear system took us 9.5 hours in Vegas 8. the ONLY time we used a different app (gimp) was for a thought bubble, everything else was in vegas: noise texture & biezer curve for faux-smoke, protype for a question mark moving about a person's head, protype for "interesting" narration-like text, solid color+cookie cutter plugin for a big bubble, solid white & biezer curve for stars above someone's head.

Honestly, if it wasn't for Vegas odds are I wouldn't of been able to do the job. It had everything I needed, ran perfectly, tackled every issue we had. Like I've said before, it was a slick as cow snot. Made changes while using RT preview to see how it looked, looping footage. While rendering out some sections we'd work on credits in another instance of vegas. The only reason we stopped working was because it was late & I needed to drive 40 minutes to get home.

best $150 I spent in a long time. So for everyone out there saying "it's no good for real work", I just spent a whole day doing it. I'd say it was as intense as anything you'd work on in broadcasting and with the AMD X2 4200, it rendered out the 40 minute video ~real time to mpeg-2 for dvd. That was with some CC on 1/2 the footage & the FX.

Comments

ushere wrote on 10/21/2007, 11:13 PM
i agree with you - it really is quite professional - thankfully i usually work independently, so i don't have a client sitting with me as i edit - otherwise they might be shocked at how easy it is to generate broadcast material, with style, so quickly!!!

i have worked with all the other mainstream nle's, though not extensively with fcp, and i have to say, for ease of use, there's nothing like it....

leslie
Grazie wrote on 10/22/2007, 12:24 AM
Well done HF! Well done indeed.

Presently I'm "slotting" together some footage I shot last Friday, to go back to a Central London organisation as a "Style-Sheet" for a pre-shot review. Consequently this will provide the client and myself with more options of getting what is wanted during the day's next shooting sequences.

It is 'cos Vegas just opens-up so many ways to get at the project and its narrative/story/concept that doing these "roughs" is now thinkable - I guess this was NOT always the way? <wink>

For me "ease-of-use"=getting to the narrative . . . Stories are like arrows in flight. If not grabbed at once, they are lost and gone forever . . !

I sure haven't had the wider "other" NLE experience of my friends hereabouts, but for me Vegas is simply just so darned transparent in allowing me to dig-out ideas faster, and faster that those ideas keep climbing over each other for notice!

Grazie
farss wrote on 10/22/2007, 12:39 AM
"So for everyone out there saying "it's no good for real work", "

Why would anyone say that about any NLE?
I've made quite a few dollars using MGI VideoWave!
I know one large broadcaster who swears by Avid's Newscutter, they think it's just great for...cutting news. Sure it seems it's majorly underpowered compared to even VMS but what do you need to cut news?

At the same time just today we were trying to help some totally lost soul. They'd come up with the bright idea of producing 10 programs by going back over ten years of tape from an annual music festival that runs for several days. They've got tapes of probably every format ever invented, audio on everything and anything, probably including R2R with TC, something between 500 and 1,000 hours of footage in all.

They went into a small Apple shop and were told, 'yeah no problem, you might just need a SAN to hold it all'. Finally they've realised they don't have an editing problem, they've got an asset management problem of massive proportions. My advice to them was to talk to the masters of asset management, Avid. I was going to suggest Vegas but not knowing even now how robust MM is I was a tad reluctant, plus they'll probably need more editing bays and it still seems we cannot run multiple suites with a shared asset database. The other thing that put me off getting involved by touting Vegas was they don't have anything like enough funding for a project of this magnitude.

Bob.
JJKizak wrote on 10/22/2007, 5:54 AM
I loved the "cow snot" reference.
JJK
TheHappyFriar wrote on 10/22/2007, 7:02 AM
Why would anyone say that about any NLE?

Actually, that's kinda the point too. One could make lots of $$ just from using MovieMaker, virtual dub, etc. it's jut no "industry recognization". how many times have we read on the forum "vegas is great but i can't be used for real video editing because of blah blah blah."

I say it's all in how you know how to use the software. I know vegas pretty well. Well enough so that when the client said "can you do this?" it was eigther yes, no, or "it would take a few hours to do...".