high bit rate mpeg2

Comments

larry-peter wrote on 3/3/2014, 2:35 PM
In my dealings with Time-Warner, Charter and Comcast for regional spots (not local market spot-insertions) there is no reasoning involved, regardless of philosophy or logic about re-encoding. You will get an auto-generated email saying your spot was rejected for not meeting spec. You'll probably then have to hunt down a tech to tell you WHAT spec wasn't met. Between these three, there seems to be auto-QC for video and audio codecs and bit rates, field dominance, length in frames and audio levels (video levels don't seem to matter to them).

On the other hand, if it's a local market insertion and I get stooopid specs, I can usually ask a tech, "how about an SD h.264 LFF at 12Mbs?" "Sure, we can take that."
riredale wrote on 3/3/2014, 6:59 PM
I'm coming to this thread late (Dad finally passed away at 95 in Arizona; last week was invested in going over his financials) but if we're talking 720x480 then MOST scenes will look pretty much perfect at, say, 8Mb/sec. But throw a scene of ocean waves or 10,000 screaming fans in an arena at the encoder and it will probably show some blockiness. Any scene that begins to look like fine-grained "noise" to the encoder will tend to show blockiness because the worst possible encoding situation is random noise.

So I guess I don't understand what gain there is by going to an astronomically high bitrate if we're showing typical scenes.
Chienworks wrote on 3/3/2014, 7:11 PM
I believe you answered your own question. The broadcasters want material that won't show the blockiness under any situations. Of course, if the material was already compressed below that level then "expanding" it back to the higher bitrate won't help. It'll just help it become less worse than using a lower bitrate.
mountainman wrote on 3/3/2014, 9:43 PM
I don't know the reason they want this bit rate. (yes this is sd data rate, HD starts at 30Mbps min.) It's double (the bit rate) since last week. Last weeks stuff looked as good as I would expect. But after 20 years of supplying ads to them, I'll just do as they ask.

Started out delivering on 3/4sp , that's tape for you youngsters out there, That tape was dubbed over to another MASTER 3/4 tape, that tape was dubbed to a head end tape and physically placed in a head end 3/4 deck for playback, one master tape per channel, per city . In some locations there were 10 to 15 3/4 decks, all waiting for a timecode signal so they could play back the ads. During a mechanical breakdown (theirs) I even delivered a VHS master. Results must have been ok 'cause we are all still in business.

The stories about this stuff is legend, let me tell you about the time they sent out a master tape for a live sports event, all the way across the state, without checking the master. Naw, that's a story for another time.

Thanks for all the replies. So far the latest ad I emailed seems to be OK. Let's hope.

J

kplo wrote on 3/4/2014, 12:07 AM
videoTguy,
"ridiculously compression rates makes no sense at all".??
Sorry, but as of about a year ago it made perfect sense to cable companies. Think: putting 6 pounds into a five pound bag....maximizing available bandwidth by compressing content to "acceptable quality". This is for SD spots...HD uploaded material may have slightly higher specs.
It's not just Charter/Time Warner systems either...I'm quite sure Comcast as well as smaller providers do it as well. This is a well known standard industry practice at the local level for commercial insertions, and my comments are not meant to denigrate any provider.
I've had many years of good relations with these companies and am more than a little finicky about the proper display of my clients' spots, but these are the facts of life when producing commercials for local markets. It's a good idea to make a copy of your program material rendered out at the mpeg bitrate the cable company compresses to. If this looks good, you can be reasonably sure that it will look good on-air.
Communication with the engineering dept. will go a long way toward getting the best quality from your material in their service areas.
Hope this helps,
Ken

kplo wrote on 3/4/2014, 12:26 AM
"KPLO, ah the "Flipper". Some producers I know nearly came to blows over that one".

I hear you mountainman. Standard practice used to be: shoot digital (DV, DVCAM),
edit, drop a broadcast filter on your out put. Render to uncompressed .avi or .mov for archive and render out the DV tape from that. Then, have a BetaSP master made for the cable company to compress and ingest into their system. Even a gorgeous Beta master could end up with greyed out blacks and low chroma. Could bring tears to your eyes.
The flipper likely has changed slightly to accommodate more HD origination and delivery, but getting more spots into the available space is still the rule. I'm amazed that many local spots look as good as they do.
Ken