LUTs Importing

shadowgun1102 wrote on 4/17/2019, 3:14 AM

First of all, thank you for making the ability to add LUTs without a third party plug-in with SV16. I was wondering though, will we ever be able to "load" LUTs packs into Vegas in bulk? It's kind of a pain to Browse for a LUT everytime. I know we can save that preset and it will be there next time, but what if we download a large LUTs pack and don't want to browse and "upload"/save them all in there? Is there a way to upload multiple LUTs into Vegas that I don't know about?

Comments

j-v wrote on 4/17/2019, 3:49 AM

Maybe you posted this on the wrong forum? This is a forum for Vegas Movie Studio and you are using SV 16 what years ago meant Sony Vegas, but Sony has nothing to do with this programs anymore and sold Vegas Creative software to Magix in 2016.

karma17 wrote on 4/17/2019, 4:49 AM

I'm not aware of any feature yet to store them by bulk, but that's not a bad feature request.

j-v wrote on 4/17/2019, 6:01 AM

But browse you have to do always, also with the other effects, you have to browse to the one you want to use. Or did @shadowgun1102 does not mean "making a choice" as "browse".
I store the ones I sometimes want to use as a preset and choose them when needed.
And @karma17 what do you want with that request. That the developers make for you a huge amount of presets you will choose one out?

mintyslippers wrote on 4/17/2019, 6:20 AM

As luts come from many places a good idea would be a lut folder. Any LUTs you place in there automatically appear in a drop down for quick and easy use.

j-v wrote on 4/17/2019, 6:49 AM

As luts come from many places a good idea would be a lut folder. Any LUTs you place in there automatically appear in a drop down for quick and easy use.

Looks pretty normal to me.
With me Vegas knows where that folder is

, like my video- and audiofiles a.s.o.
That is what one expects of good software, so I cannot imagine that it can give troubles to other users.

Eagle Six wrote on 4/17/2019, 10:26 AM

A LUT list would be much faster and easier, than browse, but they could also leave the browse feature as an option in the list, so you would have both worlds.