ok, well i installed my quad core right... then as windows loaded up the drivers for my PCI IDE controller card, for some reason its nuked one of the ports... in turn loasing a TONNE of work...
this is why you shouldnt upgrade your system hardware or software unless your between edits..
Which i was, but that another story..
Anywyas.. after discovering that windows CONTINUALLY kept nuking the MBR of these drives off this one particular IDE channel from teh PCI card, i removed both drives..
Ok so now the system runs fairly well..
still need to work out how im gonna those 2 drives back online if theyre nto totally nuked but we'll worry bout that later... right now, these obs have to go out..
OK well as i write this, i am rendering a clip to mpg2 with this new quad core..
the clip is 14minutes.. and has PNG overlays to emulate a home video recorder... im also running several correction and level filters..
above this im runninga 16:9 mask and rendering out ot MPG2 SD..
this 14min clip has taken 8 minutes to render..
last time i did this, it took over an hour.
Now a while back i put a post up about the CPU not hitting full pelt.. here now.. while rendering to MPG, its using all the cores at 100%
DV however has increased from the normal 50% to abotu 80-90% (prolly coz of the overlay requriements and masking track settings)
To say im happpy with render times is an understatement.
To say im pissed that i have to re-render some clips well ...
U get that..
In any case, just thought is post this for those who are considering upgrading but dotn have the gonads to go through with it...
What i did was pretty silly and took afew risks and for the most of it, i came out of it unscathed..
In any case, the next build i work on would be a fresh install but as it stands, i didnt have that option at this time, and losing afew non essential bits and pieces wasnt so bad, cosnidering i recovered them using GTB for NTFS.
Sadly this board doesnt like my IDE controller card, so i guess ill be going out and geting 3 400-500gb drives as opposed to using 7 smaller sub 260gb drives
In any case, It certainly is worthwhile and if this drive failure were to occur withthe old system, i would have been here rendering for teh next 5 days..
and i know that from this point on, from the moment i get these HDD's working again my workflow and delivery schedule will change immensely..
Thats a big thing coz the only REAL thing that has slowed me down over the years is rendering time. Hell, even when i usd to use a Matrox RTx100 it was never this fast.. it was realtime which meant a 4hour project took 4 hours to process..
Now this afternoon, i rendered out a 4hr project... it took 56minutes...
all this for a measly $550bux
knock on wood it remains stable for now.. still needs a bit of finetuning and im not gonna overclock it.. Id rather something stable and usable.. and a tip for those building their own PC's always buy 2 of the same Mobo just in case one fails, its a nice clean swap
ok my render is finished.. back to the next one
this is why you shouldnt upgrade your system hardware or software unless your between edits..
Which i was, but that another story..
Anywyas.. after discovering that windows CONTINUALLY kept nuking the MBR of these drives off this one particular IDE channel from teh PCI card, i removed both drives..
Ok so now the system runs fairly well..
still need to work out how im gonna those 2 drives back online if theyre nto totally nuked but we'll worry bout that later... right now, these obs have to go out..
OK well as i write this, i am rendering a clip to mpg2 with this new quad core..
the clip is 14minutes.. and has PNG overlays to emulate a home video recorder... im also running several correction and level filters..
above this im runninga 16:9 mask and rendering out ot MPG2 SD..
this 14min clip has taken 8 minutes to render..
last time i did this, it took over an hour.
Now a while back i put a post up about the CPU not hitting full pelt.. here now.. while rendering to MPG, its using all the cores at 100%
DV however has increased from the normal 50% to abotu 80-90% (prolly coz of the overlay requriements and masking track settings)
To say im happpy with render times is an understatement.
To say im pissed that i have to re-render some clips well ...
U get that..
In any case, just thought is post this for those who are considering upgrading but dotn have the gonads to go through with it...
What i did was pretty silly and took afew risks and for the most of it, i came out of it unscathed..
In any case, the next build i work on would be a fresh install but as it stands, i didnt have that option at this time, and losing afew non essential bits and pieces wasnt so bad, cosnidering i recovered them using GTB for NTFS.
Sadly this board doesnt like my IDE controller card, so i guess ill be going out and geting 3 400-500gb drives as opposed to using 7 smaller sub 260gb drives
In any case, It certainly is worthwhile and if this drive failure were to occur withthe old system, i would have been here rendering for teh next 5 days..
and i know that from this point on, from the moment i get these HDD's working again my workflow and delivery schedule will change immensely..
Thats a big thing coz the only REAL thing that has slowed me down over the years is rendering time. Hell, even when i usd to use a Matrox RTx100 it was never this fast.. it was realtime which meant a 4hour project took 4 hours to process..
Now this afternoon, i rendered out a 4hr project... it took 56minutes...
all this for a measly $550bux
knock on wood it remains stable for now.. still needs a bit of finetuning and im not gonna overclock it.. Id rather something stable and usable.. and a tip for those building their own PC's always buy 2 of the same Mobo just in case one fails, its a nice clean swap
ok my render is finished.. back to the next one