OT: A "plank" moment from the distant past

larry-peter wrote on 2/14/2012, 9:51 AM
After reading Grazie’s recent “plank” posts, I was reminded of an early experience of mine that could only be referred to as a near “cluster-plank.” But I learned a lot about client psychology in the process – as well as the dangers of digging my own grave by trying to cover up a “plank” moment.

On my third job ever as a sound recordist in 1986, I was called in the middle of the night for an early morning TV commercial job filming a celebrity exiting a private plane at a local airport. So after an emergency call to a rental house, I picked up a Nagra and shotgun mic before dawn and headed to the airport.

My initial “plank” was not checking the gear in my rush to make the call time and when I arrived at the location, found that there was no shotgun mic inside the case. Talent was already leaving the makeup trailer. I panicked because I knew my director would not tolerate a mistake of this magnitude, but remembered that I had an SM58 in my trunk from a band gig a few nights back. So I gaffer-taped the 58 inside of the huge blimp and prayed I could get the mic close enough to get some usable audio.

As soon as we began shooting, the airport runways opened and planes were taking off and landing. I could barely hear what the talent was saying over the background noise and was already planning for a new career. When we wrapped, I approached the talent and asked if he could give me a few wild takes off set for “safety.” He was in a rush but agreed to give me ONE.

I was also serving as off-line editor for the project, so I intercepted the film transfer at the production company and synced up the single wild audio take to ALL of the filmed scenes. An act of a desperate man, but the talent was so consistent it was fairly easy. At the screening session I was given a lot of praise for achieving such clean audio in a noisy location.

But then the clients began picking apart the individual takes. Not from a shooting standpoint, but an AUDIO standpoint. “I like the way he says ‘your’ in take 4 better.” “We have to use the product line from 7.” So I spent several hours repeatedly editing the same audio take back together against the master shot – sweating profusely the whole time in anticipation of someone noticing that nothing was really changing. Finally the clients decided, “Perfect!” and left happy.

The director grabbed me by the arm after they left and said, “OK, what all did you **** up?” He saw through the whole thing. When I fessed up to the whole story, he said I was the luckiest guy he had ever seen. But I kept my job.

Comments

Former user wrote on 2/14/2012, 9:57 AM
Ha Ha, great story. Clients hear and see what they want sometimes.

I had a similar, though not quite as panic worthy, where I had a client that was real particular about cutting to music. I got tired of typing in the timecodes to preview this one edit with a 1 frame shift each time. so I stored the two edits and just recalled them each time he wanted to see the preview. Of course, I accidentally stored the same edit twice so each preview was identical. But he finally decided which edit he liked better. Took him about an hour to decide.

Dave T2
larry-peter wrote on 2/14/2012, 10:04 AM
LOL. Was probably ME you did that to, Dave.

Larry
rs170a wrote on 2/14/2012, 10:18 AM
Oldies but still goodies.

THE TOP 10 LIES CLIENTS TELL THEIR EDITOR

10. It's pretty simple. It should only take an hour...
9. Budget? Don't worry about it.
8. Feel free to be creative with this...
7. I only need a couple of dubs...
6. The client will love it! They won't make any changes...
5. I'm positive we've got that shot on another tape...
4. I've never had this problem anywhere else I've edited...
3. Could I see it just one more time...
2. I thought you'd be able to just paint it out...
1. How hard can it be?


THE TOP 10 LIES EDITORS TELL CLIENTS

10. It's just a preview shift...
9. It's out of the safe area, you'll never see it on the air...
8. It won't really look like that...
7. I'll fill out the paperwork tomorrow...
6. Why no, I don't mind working Saturday...
5. Oh, don't go by THAT monitor...
4. It works better as a cut...
3. It's on the source tape...
2. I think it looks just fine...
1. "I'll be home soon."

Mike
Former user wrote on 2/14/2012, 10:55 AM
You couldn't guess how many times I said "it;s just the monitor".

Our edit rooms had the tech monitor and a regular TV for clients to view. When a client would ask me which was correct, I would ask them which one they liked. If they said the Tech Monitor, I would assure them that was what was getting recorded. If they said the Tv, I would say that is probably the way it will look at home. Most of them would fall for it.

Dave T2
larry-peter wrote on 2/14/2012, 11:53 AM
Went through a monitor scenario too (not with Dave) where a client complained that the footage was milky and washed out. Editor adjusted the client monitor. Client complained that the tech monitor looked different. Editor told him that he needed the monitor to look that way. Client said it confused him, so editor adjusted the tech monitor. Client later calls the editor complaining that the spot on air looks terrible. Editor tells him to turn up brightness, contrast and saturation on his home set. Client is happy.