OT: Octoshape Grid Enhancement to Flash Player

xberk wrote on 6/5/2010, 1:36 PM
CNN video is asking me if I want to install the Octoshape Grid Delivery Enhancement for Flash video to speed things up. I'm not sure I want to install it. Any one have an opinion? I'm running Win 7 64 bit.

Octoshape info

Paul B .. PCI Express Video Card: EVGA VCX 10G-P5-3885-KL GeForce RTX 3080 XC3 ULTRA ,,  Intel Core i9-11900K Desktop Processor ,,  MSI Z590-A PRO Desktop Motherboard LGA-1200 ,, 64GB (2X32GB) XPG GAMMIX D45 DDR4 3200MHz 288-Pin SDRAM PC4-25600 Memory .. Seasonic Power Supply SSR-1000FX Focus Plus 1000W ,, Arctic Liquid Freezer II – 360MM .. Fractal Design case ,, Samsung Solid State Drive MZ-V8P1T0B/AM 980 PRO 1TB PCI Express 4 NVMe M.2 ,, Wundiws 10 .. Vegas Pro 19 Edit

Comments

Chienworks wrote on 6/5/2010, 6:41 PM
Looks like it's basically torrent technology. In itself it's not really a bad thing, however in my brief experimentation with torrents i did receive a few infected files which i could have gotten cleanly through more direct methods so i stopped using it.

Note that the speed benefit comes from multiple users around the globe all sharing bits of the file with each other. While this is a nifty idea in some ways it does have a fewf issues that lots of new users don't realize at first.

- If it's new content then there are unlikely to be many other people who have many of the parts yet, so you will still be fetching from the original "seed" which won't give you much benefit.

- Many of the pieces may be stored on end-user computers with very slow upload speeds. No matter how fast your download speed is, the file won't move faster than the slowest link in the chain. My experience was that fetching from torrents were some of the most abysmally slow downloads i've ever fetched.

- In order for this sharing method to be effective you'll be expected to keep the content on your own computer and allow other people to retrieve parts from you. If your upload connection is slow then you may risk saturating it as more and more people start retrieving from you. Your ISP may also not allow it and impose various sanctions on your account if it's abused in this way.

- The entity that really benefits is the original content provider who no longer has to serve up a complete copy of the file to everyone who wants to see it. It doesn't really seem to have much actual benefit for the viewers. All their claims about better quality and such are ideal benefits in the best situations that are unlikely to actually be seen by you.
xberk wrote on 6/5/2010, 10:26 PM
Thanks Kelly for that lucid and instructive explanation. Why am I not surprised that CNN.COM gets the major benefit. Back in the heyday of Napster, I think it was something similar. I certainly want things like this far from my editing machine, but I might try it on some other "internet only" system to see if there is any real benefit.
- Paul

Paul B .. PCI Express Video Card: EVGA VCX 10G-P5-3885-KL GeForce RTX 3080 XC3 ULTRA ,,  Intel Core i9-11900K Desktop Processor ,,  MSI Z590-A PRO Desktop Motherboard LGA-1200 ,, 64GB (2X32GB) XPG GAMMIX D45 DDR4 3200MHz 288-Pin SDRAM PC4-25600 Memory .. Seasonic Power Supply SSR-1000FX Focus Plus 1000W ,, Arctic Liquid Freezer II – 360MM .. Fractal Design case ,, Samsung Solid State Drive MZ-V8P1T0B/AM 980 PRO 1TB PCI Express 4 NVMe M.2 ,, Wundiws 10 .. Vegas Pro 19 Edit