OT: Removing Interlacing on 1080i footage

Comments

GlennChan wrote on 12/29/2007, 12:30 AM
My non-scientific observations about watching material on a CRT:

60i looks weird. It doesn't deliver seamless motion. I just don't buy the argument that 60i has better-looking motion than say 30p.

24p with 3:2 pulldown looks like it has "sticky" motion sometimes on fast pans.

30p looks pretty similar to 24p

*sometimes CRTs will have a slight flicker to them

None really deliver perfect motion, though I think I prefer the look of progressive. I can't remember 24Psf. If you're watching a show, I pretty much forget about the motion once I get immersed in the show. Motion issues don't really stick out and aren't distracting.

For 3-D, 24p is not good enough and sticks out. It is noticeable and a little distracting.
Opampman wrote on 12/29/2007, 9:03 PM
John - I remember back in the 60's when I was a film Cinematographer panning with the Worall gear head and a Mitchell BNC trying to get smooth movement and the shots always looked like a flip card book with stuttering pans no matter how hard I tried to crank those gears smoothly. 24 fps is NOT the way to go!
MH_Stevens wrote on 12/31/2007, 1:03 PM
I have run the FX1 (1080i) for nearly three years now and whatever I have done the result has always been better staying with the interlaced way it was recorded. Even going to AVCHD for display on a 1080p monitor it's best NOT deinterlacing. I wont be making progressive projects until I get a progressive camera.