I don't run antivirus software or pop up blockers or anything like that as I have not needed to. I am proficient enough to know how to stay away from sites that may contain something I don't want, but I thought the above to be interesting but I wondered what kind of a lag time is associated with using it if any?
With XPe you don't need an anti-virus with exception of BIOS settings lock when it
re-images each time it is used. You are running out of memory so faster.
However a program such as Vegas or DVDA that needs lots of memory may cause
problems.
In this case with Sandboxie you would still need a network shared drive. There
is the chance a network aware virus (many are) will implant itself on the network
drive and spread to users.
I thought about downloading it and giving it a run, but I wanted to see if anybody else has already had experience with it and knew of the lag time it may or may not incorporate. (I currently have 2 projects up and running on my editor). I really don't think I would ever need it (but who thinks they ever need protection) as I don't use anything else on my editor save for the programs I use.
Laurence, since you are giving it a go, how does lag time enter into the equation?
It feels exactly the same so far. If you call up a Sandboxed version of IE and browse, then close it and open up a regular instance of IE, none of the sandboxed browsed sites show up in your history. That's as far as I've gone so far, but I imagine you are pretty safe from tracking cookies and malware as well.
This seems like a product who's main use will be to help guys browse for porn undedtected, but I think it is also useful to us video types who want to keep a system as clean and efficient as possible without insulating work PCs from the Internet all together.