OT Why I Don't Like Windows 7 32Bit Pro

JJKizak wrote on 4/14/2012, 7:10 AM
1...IE9 says Amazon certificate suspect and no matter what you click it hangs.
2...Win 7 cold boots up different every time---different order of things and sometimes no icons on the lower right.
3...Extremely long shutdown close to 40 seconds
4...Doesn't like old hardware
5...Has about a two second delay on opening anything in "E" mail
6...Takes about 15 seconds for Media Player to open after inserting DVD.
7...Sometimes when selecting something nothing happens for about 20 seconds because hard drive going bananas with some internal Windows background going on.
8...Sometimes will dump itself then reboot like nothing happened.
JJK

Comments

PeterDuke wrote on 4/14/2012, 7:31 AM
I have #7 after a reinstall but it eventually goes away.

My pet hates:

1 Microsoft altered the C: drive file and folder structure without first consulting me. We now have real files with slightly different names and signposts to the old file names for backward compatibility, thereby adding to the clutter and achieving what? The so-called libraries are no use because I put all my data on separate disks anyway.

2 The security paranoia where I need to seek permission to make certain changes to my own computer, such as installing a file on the C: drive.

3: I can't arrange icons on the desktop and have them left alone.
earthrisers wrote on 4/14/2012, 12:28 PM
I actually like Win7 32bit Pro, at least a bit (not 32 bits).
Libraries are a feature I like the most... I have a number of external drives (about 10 terabytes, on 6 separate drives), and I use the Libraries feature often to keep track of the various source-file locations for my multicamera projects.
I do DISLIKE the somewhat unpredictable aspects of the Security features. Many more times than once, Win7 told me I couldn't make changes to such-and-such a folder because I didn't "own" it. And that's on a system that has only ONE user (me), which has complete administrative privileges. I usually go through the tiresome "take ownership" drill with success, but I'm not at all fond of the way that works.
VidMus wrote on 4/14/2012, 5:08 PM
JJKizak, you have 8 gig of ram and are using the 32 bit version of windows which does not allow full access of all of your ram. Why are you not using the 64 bit version?

That does not make sense!

As for your problems, it looks like you might have a faulty install and/or other issues. I would do a clean install with the 64 bit version.
videoITguy wrote on 4/14/2012, 9:43 PM
I see that several posts in this thread topic have some common issues in the build of Win7Pro 32bit. Having recently built my own PC from new parts and 32bitPro OEM, I would like to add my experience. I would also note that I have been building workstation class as well network servers for 17 years.....

Any new build can come up with results varying from complete CPU /MBoard being fried to just annoying OS quirks. This last OEM build seems to be one of the latter for me. My first boots and burn-in testing revealed that the native install creates conflicts in "services" called to run at start-up. I could not believe this at first - but checking resources from Microsoft etc. did reveal this to be a very potential and documented problem with Win7Pro. Fixed that.

Then upon installing the first software on the OS for basic applications found that errors were documented in the event log...which after some period ot time dissappeared on their own accord.

Then the PC would occassionaly hang - no errors in event-log or experience of other problems. I had a choice to soft power-off the motherboard or to actually kill power at the power supply. When I used the soft-power off (a feature of the Mboard power switch) - the PC rebooted just fine to open Win7Pro as I would have expected. Except that most of the security permissions had switched themselves to lock-out the admin account- Never ever saw behavior of that type- luckily I had enough control left to retake over ownership and reset permissions on every needed directory on the hard-drive.
Ironically I have since tested the security lock-out with a drastic step of kill at the power supply and this kind of security breach does not happen. One would think that should really work to destroy the system.

So verdict I have given Win7Pro 32bit - just a bit quirky in operations but fairly resilient in computer reboots.
JJKizak wrote on 4/15/2012, 7:07 AM
VidMus:
The computer I am referring to is my "Online" computer which uses Windows 7 32 bit with older Gigabyte board/AMD processor and 1 gig of ram. . The data you have referred to is about my "Movie Editing" computer which uses Vista 64 bit Ultimate which is as stable as a rock. The number three backup computer uses Windows XP 32 bit pro with 2 gig of ram which is stable as a rock and is used primarily for printing discs. Mom's computer (She cannot operate it anymore) which uses Windows XP is stable as a rock but I have to use it to get into the loggins on some HTTPS sites with IE8 which Win 7 32 bit Pro/IE9 cannot, no matter how you juggle the options. I didn't mean to imply that I was having these problems with the video eding computer.
JJK
Former user wrote on 4/15/2012, 8:13 AM
Sounds like this very old machine seems to be telling you it's not capable of Windows 7 - especially with a single GB of RAM (that alone would be giving anyone a boat load of slowness right off the bat) - why bother with Win 7 32bit at all?

Stick XP SP3 on there and be done with it. Everything will work great with no hassles.

VP
NicolSD wrote on 4/15/2012, 8:21 AM
1 gig of RAM is the minimum to rum Windows 7 32bit. That means that you will not get the best performance out of your computer. Minimum is never the way to go.
Chienworks wrote on 4/15/2012, 9:28 AM
Couple weeks ago i picked out a new PC for my parents. It's running Win7 home, got a dual-core 2.2GHz processor (sorry, don't remember which one), 4GB RAM, 750GB drive, and included a 22" LCD monitor. All this for $379.

Kinda hard to imagine anyone sticking with 1GB these days.

Amusingly enough, i thought i'd try them out on the default "out-of-the-box" Win7 GUI theme just to see how much they hated it, compared to being set in their ways with the ol' 98SE classic theme. Turns out they didn't even notice the difference. They just started using it immediately. It wasn't until i asked if they were ok with the different layout that they noticed it.