Pluraleyes Upgrade

bsuratt wrote on 7/29/2014, 6:14 PM

Has anyone upgraded to Pluraleyes 3.5 over V2? Is there enough reason to do so?

Comments

Tom Pauncz wrote on 7/29/2014, 7:23 PM

Not specifically to 3.5 - I have 3.2. I like the new version, even if it's not a plug-in per se.

Thanks for the heads-up for v3.5.

Tom

Byron K wrote on 7/31/2014, 2:27 PM

Personally, I've still found PE3 quirky. It doesn't recognize some audio formats that I've been using all this time but PE2 always seems to work fine.

On my latest multi cam video project I went straight to PE2 didn't even bother w/ 3.

Cliff Etzel wrote on 7/31/2014, 3:31 PM

I was able to upgrade for free since I had recently upgraded to version 3.3. The audio drift correction feature for me was worth upgrading in itself as I shoot dual sync audio with DSLR video.

bsuratt wrote on 7/31/2014, 11:29 PM

Thanks for the replies.... so far PE2 has served me well on 3 cam + board audio weekly production. I'll stay where I am just now.

xberk wrote on 11/20/2014, 10:46 AM

Any further thoughts on Plural Eyes 3.5 ... I use Plural eyes 3.3 with mostly success but occasionally I have to fall back to Plural Eyes 2 as 3 just won't do it. I know others have experienced this. I don't do anything fancy .. just plain sync of multiple audio tracks.