I am a Canopus convert to Vegas 4. I currently have a dual Xeon 1.7 Ghz Dell WS 350 and a Canopus ACeDvio board to send output to my TV monitor. I was totally impressed with the quality of the near real time displays on my external monito, even on preview auto mode.
Just the other day I decided to buy a second flat panel computer monitor and hooked it up, with the primary flat panel monitor, to an older dual output video card I had laying around (an ATI Radeon) and continued using the external TV monitor. I felt very professional with 2 LCD's and a TV monitor.
Unfortunately, my external previews now all look very choppy and pixelated, unless I set my preview settings to Good or Best (which slows it down a lot). Before the previews were much cleaner and faster when I had the single LCD monitor setup.
Would adding a second LCD put a drain on my CPU to slow Vegas down? Could anyone gauge what might be wrong? I did have a fast NVidea graphics card in my initial setup. But as I understand Vegas doesn't use GPU, just CPU? Is that correct or should I invest in a new dual video monitor card with more horsepower. ?
Thanks so much,
MarcS
Just the other day I decided to buy a second flat panel computer monitor and hooked it up, with the primary flat panel monitor, to an older dual output video card I had laying around (an ATI Radeon) and continued using the external TV monitor. I felt very professional with 2 LCD's and a TV monitor.
Unfortunately, my external previews now all look very choppy and pixelated, unless I set my preview settings to Good or Best (which slows it down a lot). Before the previews were much cleaner and faster when I had the single LCD monitor setup.
Would adding a second LCD put a drain on my CPU to slow Vegas down? Could anyone gauge what might be wrong? I did have a fast NVidea graphics card in my initial setup. But as I understand Vegas doesn't use GPU, just CPU? Is that correct or should I invest in a new dual video monitor card with more horsepower. ?
Thanks so much,
MarcS