Rendering to x265, which is better multithreaded than x264. All 32 physical/virtual cores in my 13900K pegged and a good amount of iGPU usage at 60%.
I should add that screen grab was during Pass 1 of a 2-pass encode. 100% CPU on the 2nd pass as well though.
I should add that screen grab was during Pass 1 of a 2-pass encode. 100% CPU on the 2nd pass as well though.
Can you try parking your e-cores like this user did on Win11 with 12900K, see if it improves performance?
I should add that screen grab was during Pass 1 of a 2-pass encode. 100% CPU on the 2nd pass as well though.
Can you try parking your e-cores like this user did on Win11 with 12900K, see if it improves performance?
I've been doing tons of testing with Cinebench, Handbrake, and Vegas pro. Disabling cores via BIOS, changing power levels, etc.. Best performance is always in 8+16 configuration. In fact in a couple tests I set a 1+16 configuration with the P set at 1.4GHz and the E's at 4.3GHz. The Thread Director correctly used an E core when running Cinebench R23 ST as it at 4.3GHz is more performant than a P at 1.4GHz. Same result with the old CPUmark99 (also ST) benchmark. The E scores are definitely Skylake level IPC. Very impressive. If you want more info go to my posts at Anandtech at the Raptor Lake thread.