Render Time[s]

aress wrote on 4/26/2004, 9:08 AM

OK, V5 is great, love all the new stuff... but even on my 3gig P4, 533fsb, render times are still SLOOOOWWW.... not much better than V4....

What is the solution for quicker renders? dual Xeon chipset? i would do this if i knew that a 60 minute video render, would be less than 4-5 hours.

anyone have any ideas....

Back to post

Comments

gwyador wrote on 4/28/2004, 11:55 AM

Here's to hopin' Sony releases the update to work with the Decklink real time 10 bit cards soon! I don't own one but for 295$ I would pick one up since it would give me realtime analog playback from vegas and no or very low render times more like my storm card in premiere....I still wish my storm card could be used in vegas...Oh well...

gwyador wrote on 4/28/2004, 12:03 PM

I should just add that I don't want anyone chewing me out for suggestion vegas is not real time... as long as I have to render for my final output...it's NOT... I do appreciate very much that I do not have to render just to see what it might look like but I am hoping for more than that in real time!!

busterkeaton wrote on 4/28/2004, 2:05 PM

Sony PJM,

Thanks for clearing that up.

donp wrote on 4/28/2004, 7:16 PM

I'm just doing this render for myself, a 1 hour and 46 minute movie from one one of my old VCR tapes. I used the Movie Look filter and the the resolution filter to remove vidio noise and improve the look. First time I have done this. The record time is reading 87 hours +. It has been running for 24 hours and has only done 7% of the time line.

Vegas 5.0a, 233 FSB mobo, 1.5 Athlon XP, 1GIG DDR memory.

I have always known adding filters caused expanded render times and i thing ones like Movie Look will really bump it up.