Hi,
I've been experimenting with compressed video renders from VV3. The best quality for the least space so far seems to go to the Sorenson codec. I've settled upon a 75 to 85k bit rate. One thing that is curious is I get better results with Sorenson V2 compared to Sorenson V3. The Sorenson V3 mov file suffers from alot of blur at the same bit rate as my V2 sample. I'm using the built in codecs that come with VV3. Usually the newer version of a codec is better. In my tests this is not the case.
In my tests with Windows media so far, I have been unable to get as good quality as the Sorenson at the equivalent bit rate and file size. I find the default templates for all these codecs less than optimal. I've had to play with settings alot.
Anyone have suggestions for optimal compresson strategies. Right now I'm going witha 24x180 window size.
Thanks.
-CB
I've been experimenting with compressed video renders from VV3. The best quality for the least space so far seems to go to the Sorenson codec. I've settled upon a 75 to 85k bit rate. One thing that is curious is I get better results with Sorenson V2 compared to Sorenson V3. The Sorenson V3 mov file suffers from alot of blur at the same bit rate as my V2 sample. I'm using the built in codecs that come with VV3. Usually the newer version of a codec is better. In my tests this is not the case.
In my tests with Windows media so far, I have been unable to get as good quality as the Sorenson at the equivalent bit rate and file size. I find the default templates for all these codecs less than optimal. I've had to play with settings alot.
Anyone have suggestions for optimal compresson strategies. Right now I'm going witha 24x180 window size.
Thanks.
-CB