Subtle, yet major, bug in Vegas

Comments

BillyBoy wrote on 5/6/2003, 11:29 PM
"The attitude that BB has is that no one on this board, or at SoFo, cares because 'adding one frame is not a big deal".

This is a forum, not a board. Bulletin boards are long gone for the most part but were popular before the Web caught on. <wink>

My beef with John wasn't his 'problem' rather HIS attitude. He acted like, hey I'm a big time producer that does work for a TV network, I'm so important, SoFo drop everything and fix Vegas to handle this After Effects "bug", if you don't, I'm out of here.

That's kind of arrogance and excessive rudness is uncalled for. And John compounded his rudeness by suggesting those that do 'something for grandma' (his words) are less important or less knowledgeable than he or others. So the message John sent was I'm a big shot doing work for some TV network so my work is much more imporant that whatever project you're working on and no matter how trival my problem it should be taken care of first. That's what I took issue with and still do. I try to help EVERYBODY. So do a lot of others here. I rank 'problems' by how many they effect, not by the who's asking. I just know different people use Vegas for different things. To suggest some are less 'professional' or care less, or do sloppy work or don't give a rant's ass (John's tone) was exceeeding rude and yes, I'm still pissed about it. Not that I do things for grandma, I simply couldn't ever be so condescending as John was. Maybe he was having a bad day. I guess. Trying to paint me as the bad guy is pretty funny.
TimTyler wrote on 5/6/2003, 11:47 PM
> My beef with John wasn't his ....

Dude,

Shut the fu@# up, and move on.
Brazilian wrote on 5/7/2003, 1:42 AM
John;

SpeedMangler shows the "true" framerate, in the sense that it is the "rate" divided by the "scale", which are the two fields that are in the AVI file that determine the ultimate framerate. Just punch the two numbers you get into a calculator.

Having said that however, SpeedMangler mangles... so for the time being, you'd have to run it twice, once to see the original speed and once to change it back (unless it was already 30000/1001). I'll make a "look only" version or commandline switch and post up a new version in the next day or so and post a new message when it's available.
John_Cline wrote on 5/7/2003, 2:31 AM
Excellent. Thank you very much, Brazilian, I'll be looking forward to it.

John