Hi. Anyone out there know the answer to this regarding CODECs and re-encoding of footage.. here is my scenario..
1/. I capture some raw PAL DV footage into the computer using Vegas. This is saved as a DV AVI file of course.
2/. I trim the clip and alter the sound (EQ, compression etc).
3/. No filters or any other changes to the video other than as above mentioned trim
4/. I output the above edited file using SAVE AS AVI (PAL DV)
My question is - have I lost ANY video quality if you were to compare the original video DV file and the output from step 4?
Is Vegas just straight copying the input video to the output video as its smart enough to know that no filters etc have been applied? or does it all have to be re-encoded from scratch again?
What I am getting at here.. (and related to my last post!) is this would seem to me to be a workaround to using for example Cinemacraft Encoder (should I want to use this alternative encoder). I would want to feed it the best quality footage of course but need to apply simple edits to the raw footage as detailed above.
I have heard someone say feed Cinemacraft HUFFY files (huge uncompressed frames I take it) which is fair enough if there are lots of filters etc. but for my needs above - am I RIGHT in thinking I am losing NO quality with the type of edits I would be performing?
Lastly, say I was to superimpose some titles onto the start of the footage (at step 2 of above!), would it ony re-render the specific part with the titles on it?
I would obviously loose a tiny but of quality on this part due to the re-encoding I take it.. (in theory although you might not notice it in practice)??
I can't try any of this out (yet!) - just wanting confirmation my theories are correct..
I hope this makes sense - am writing in a bit of a rush here.
Thanks
1/. I capture some raw PAL DV footage into the computer using Vegas. This is saved as a DV AVI file of course.
2/. I trim the clip and alter the sound (EQ, compression etc).
3/. No filters or any other changes to the video other than as above mentioned trim
4/. I output the above edited file using SAVE AS AVI (PAL DV)
My question is - have I lost ANY video quality if you were to compare the original video DV file and the output from step 4?
Is Vegas just straight copying the input video to the output video as its smart enough to know that no filters etc have been applied? or does it all have to be re-encoded from scratch again?
What I am getting at here.. (and related to my last post!) is this would seem to me to be a workaround to using for example Cinemacraft Encoder (should I want to use this alternative encoder). I would want to feed it the best quality footage of course but need to apply simple edits to the raw footage as detailed above.
I have heard someone say feed Cinemacraft HUFFY files (huge uncompressed frames I take it) which is fair enough if there are lots of filters etc. but for my needs above - am I RIGHT in thinking I am losing NO quality with the type of edits I would be performing?
Lastly, say I was to superimpose some titles onto the start of the footage (at step 2 of above!), would it ony re-render the specific part with the titles on it?
I would obviously loose a tiny but of quality on this part due to the re-encoding I take it.. (in theory although you might not notice it in practice)??
I can't try any of this out (yet!) - just wanting confirmation my theories are correct..
I hope this makes sense - am writing in a bit of a rush here.
Thanks