The Review is very much on point about the benefits of the Catalyst suite. This would be expected of the garden type variety reviewer.
What is missing- (aha, perhaps just as it is from the marketing advance materials published by Sony) - is what purpose and target audience this product is designed to support.
It has NOTHING to do with a VegasPro market (past,present, or future) and that is something that a lot of VegasPro users in this forum have yet to learn, based on the half-baked comparisons between VegasPro and Catalyst posted in this forum.
It has NOTHING to do with a VegasPro market (past,present, or future) and that is something that a lot of VegasPro users in this forum have yet to learn, based on the half-baked comparisons between VegasPro and Catalyst posted in this forum.
if scs intends discontinuing vegas and expects cat to take it's place then it has very much to do with this forum.
and as for half-baked, well, having tested edit quite extensively all i can say is that edit is what is half-baked...
It would seem half baked is the only way to write reviews these days. Everyone seems so polarized on hardware and software. Who really cares what paint brush you use, or camera brand you choose.
There could be legal reasons more than just tech to re-write from the ground up. Who really knows how SCS is bound to both Vegas's history and Sony.