Comments

Wolfgang S. wrote on 2/1/2017, 10:34 AM

The free LUT plugin by vision colors shows a relative low performance, but that is the plugin. In the later versions of Looks (so 3 and 4) you can also use a LUT plugin for Vegas, what has a better performance.

I cannot tell you more about their LUTs, because I do not use them.

Desktop: PC AMD 3960X, 24x3,8 Mhz * RTX 3080 Ti (12 GB)* Blackmagic Extreme 4K 12G * QNAP Max8 10 Gb Lan * Resolve Studio 18 * Edius X* Blackmagic Pocket 6K/6K Pro, EVA1, FS7

Laptop: ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED * internal HDR preview * i9 12900H with i-GPU Iris XE * 32 GB Ram) * Geforce RTX 3070 TI 8GB * internal HDR preview on the laptop monitor * Blackmagic Ultrastudio 4K mini

HDR monitor: ProArt Monitor PA32 UCG-K 1600 nits, Atomos Sumo

Others: Edius NX (Canopus NX)-card in an old XP-System. Edius 4.6 and other systems

fhu wrote on 2/1/2017, 11:23 AM

I've used them in the past. They can be a pain because Vegas does not allow a way to quickly apply a LUT so I use MB Looks to apply. Time consuming but they do look nice... nothing you can't achieve thru MB Looks alone though.

Red Prince wrote on 2/1/2017, 12:35 PM

Vegas does not allow a way to quickly apply a LUT

Vegas doesn’t have a way to apply a LUT, period. I wish it did (after all, it calls itself Professional), but it doesn’t. You need a third-party plug-in.

He who knows does not speak; he who speaks does not know.
                    — Lao Tze in Tao Te Ching

Can you imagine the silence if everyone only said what he knows?
                    — Karel Čapek (The guy who gave us the word “robot” in R.U.R.)

liork wrote on 2/2/2017, 6:44 AM

The free LUT plugin by vision colors shows a relative low performance, but that is the plugin. In the later versions of Looks (so 3 and 4) you can also use a LUT plugin for Vegas, what has a better performance.

I cannot tell you more about their LUTs, because I do not use them.

What do you mean by "low performance"?