What is the best/most efficient codec for editing?

Comments

PerroneFord wrote on 7/2/2009, 1:19 PM
But that's not a full raster codec.... it's only 1440x1080. Or am I missing something?
malowz wrote on 7/2/2009, 2:25 PM
it is "full raster", can be 1920x1080, 1440x1080, 720x480...

i use it for everything, including when converting HD>SD. ;)

its a DCT based codec, 4:2:2
MPM wrote on 7/2/2009, 3:00 PM
FWIW, Don Graft has a new version of DGIndex for AVC vid, & it can use Cuda for any Nvidia users out there. The downside is that Vegas, unlike P/pro won't directly support AviSynth so you have to work with an intermediate like VFAPi or ffdshow's makeavis.

Not saying it's any better or worse than anything else -- only that some folks are having a lot of success with it.
malowz wrote on 7/2/2009, 3:27 PM
here im using a home-made batch, using ffmpeg to extract audio, ffmpegsource to open in avs + audio, convert in vdub "silently" to canopus HQ in HD, and also, downsize with a motion-compensated deinterlacer to get a very sharp interlaced SD (compressed with canopus HQ also)

so i get a 4:2:2 HD and SD easly direct from original mp4 files, ready to edit.

preview in 960x540 i get full fps, and of course, export without recompress, pre-render only when needed, like DV...

for avchd/hdv, im using carbon coder. very powerful... and expensive... :(