Which is best? SteadyMove, SteadyHand, Deshaker

johnmeyer wrote on 3/4/2004, 3:01 PM
In reading this thread:

How to stablize shake in VV4 like Steady Move

I wondered if anyone had experience with all three image stabilization programs mentioned in the subject of this thread? I have only used Steadyhand, and it has always seemed like a product that was never quite finished. The demos of SteadyMove make it appear to be a much better product, but since it doesn't plug into Vegas, and I don't own Premiere, I can't try it for myself. As for DeShaker, I tried it years ago, and it wasn't very good, but I just downloaded the latest version and it has obviously been enhanced considerably. I will be trying it out shortly.

Any hands-on experience, especially if you have tried more than one of these products, would be very welcome.

Comments

Jay Gladwell wrote on 3/4/2004, 3:22 PM
Like you, I haven't (I can't) tried SteadyMove, and haven't tried DeShaker. I have tried SteadyHand, though. The only thing I don't like about it is that it seems to zoom in too far on the image in an effort to mask the edges.

I wish the user had control over how much it would zoom in on the image.

Too, I'll be interested in hearing about your experience with DeShaker!

J--
PAW wrote on 3/4/2004, 3:25 PM
Hello John,

You can also try the motion stabilisers in Boris RED if you have or are thinking of RED.

It does plugin to Vegas but the motion tracking does not work as Vegas only sends a single frame to the plugin.

If you wanted to save creating AVI's you may be able to frameserve out to RED and then save a project with the tracking data and any other effects you want and then apply that within the plugin - I must give that a go.

Regards, Paul
riredale wrote on 3/4/2004, 3:51 PM
Videocurmudgeon: Don't use the zoom feature in SteadyHand. Just render the shaky video and import it into Vegas. When you play it, you'll immediately see the black borders moving to and fro. Now go into the Pan/Crop feature of Vegas, and enlarge the frame as needed to hide the black borders. I've found I can get very slick with this feature, and slowly zoom in and out as needed to cover the problem portions while not hurting the resolution of those parts of the video that don't need enlarging. Also, I find I don't need the default amount of correction that SteadyHand offers. I scale the integration time back to 333 from 667, and still get a significant amount of steadying while minimizing the black bands.

The only drawback of digital image stabilization is the loss of sharpness due to the necessary zooming; using the Vegas tools we can choose to zoom in some parts and not in others.
Jay Gladwell wrote on 3/4/2004, 4:30 PM
Thanks for the info, riredale! Good idea.

As I look at SteadyHand, I don't see where I can "scale the integration time back" as you described.

J--
rextilleon wrote on 3/4/2004, 4:35 PM
Steady Hand--
JJKizak wrote on 3/4/2004, 4:40 PM
I have used SteadyHand and Deshaker and found the changing focus problem to be irritating. Even still they do work pretty well. The focus changing is visable on very distant objects within the picture in SteadyHand.
Deshaker tended to give me too much jitter as if it was zooming in and out very rapidly. If your doing any letterboxing the horizontal or vertical corrections must be shut off or the picture travels all over the place like a yo yo. They do help however in some shaky situations that have to be corrected.
Like the People say on these forums---Tripod or optical stabilization---.

JJK
taliesin wrote on 3/4/2004, 4:47 PM
>> Deshaker tended to give me too much jitter as if it was zooming in and out very rapidly.

You can avoid this if you choose "Fixed Zoom" for "Edge Compensation" in the second pass process.

Marco
JJKizak wrote on 3/4/2004, 4:52 PM
Taliesin: I can't remember trying that but i must have run off over 30 tests of the same clip, a chopper taking off with different settings on the first and second passes.

JJK
taliesin wrote on 3/4/2004, 5:04 PM
I mentioned it because I had exactly the same problem with my video getting zoomed in and out after having used Deshaker. Till yesterday when somebody gave me the hint to have "Fixed Zoom" selected for the second pass preference. Using this setting now I don't have any zooming no more.
It does not mean you have to have different settings for first and second pass. But "Fixed Zoom" is available in the second pass area of Deshakers setting dialogue only.

Marco
RalphM wrote on 3/4/2004, 6:21 PM
VideoCurmudgeon,

I believe he's referring to the Custom Settings under the Motion Correction area..
johnmeyer wrote on 3/4/2004, 6:57 PM
I wish the user had control over how much it would zoom in on the image. : VideoCurmudgeon

In addition to the comments already made, I should note that you can control this in Steadyhand by first setting everything up the way you want, and then as the last step, click on "Custom Settings" (found in the "Motion Correction" section of the main screen). You will then get a dialog box that has "Horizontal Pan," "Vertical Pan," "Zoom," and "Rotation." Set Zoom to zero (0). I don't think is the zoom you were referring to, but setting it to zero gets rid of Steadyhand's tendency to "pulse" in and out. If you then click on "Target Window Settings," you'll be able to control the size of the window that Steadyhand uses: Make the window smaller, and you'll zoom further into the picture; make it larger and you won't zoom in as much.

Don't use the zoom feature in SteadyHand riredale

I assume you are referring to the "Video Edge Treatment." If you select "No Edge Correction," you will get exactly the result that you describe. Doing this, and then using the Pan/Crop in Vegas to zoom in and eliminate the borders is a very intriguing idea. I think this might eliminate some of the artifacts that I think Steadyhand introduces when it does its own cropping and zooming.

Thanks for the great tip!
Steve672 wrote on 3/4/2004, 8:30 PM
At the risk of being shot I will mention that the new version of Pinnacle Studio 9 has image stabilization. I have only read the reviews but did not try it first hand since I am an ex user of Pinnacle Studio and I haven't had a crash or a hang since since I switched to Vegas :-)

Steve
Jay Gladwell wrote on 3/5/2004, 5:36 AM
Got it! Thanks!

J--