Which rendering process with Vegas?

flyboy320 wrote on 3/21/2004, 6:49 AM
I am sure the answer is around somewhere, but I have searched and cannot find it, so I apologize if the question has been asked before.

I am trying to burn a dvd (in both NTSC and Pal format) using images from my Optio S4 digital camera, both jpg stills and avi movies. When I am done with my creation in Vegas, and ready to create the dvd using something such as Reeldvd, I am a bit confused as to which format I should render the video in with Vegas. Since I am going to be using another program to authorize the dvd, I want to avoid compressing and re compressing the video as much as possible. I assume its being compressed once with the camera, then un-compressed with Vegas, then re-compressed when rendering with Vegas, then un-compressed again with whatever software I use the create the dvd with (but I'm just guessing at this).

So my question is, what the best way to render the movie, using Vegas, so as to minimize quality loss throughout the process?

Comments

JohnnyRoy wrote on 3/21/2004, 8:18 AM
Your best bet would be to render direct to MPEG2 from Vegas. Use the NTSC DVD template and the NTSC PAL template to render two files. BTW, there isn’t as much uncompressing and recompressing as you suggest. If you were to render to a DV AVI file, Vegas would simply copy those sections that haven’t changed without any recompression. So only sections that are new or get changed (i.e., transitions, FX, etc) get recompressed when going from AVI to AVI. Of course everything gets recompressed when going from AVI to MPEG2.

~jr
flyboy320 wrote on 3/21/2004, 8:29 AM
JohnnyRoy,

Thanks for the reply. I thought that might be the best way, but wasn't sure.

Thanks... :)