Intel 750

astar wrote on 4/9/2015, 12:36 AM
Surprised no one has talked about the Intel 750 SSD. For video editing it would seem like a good performer for uncompressed work or multiple lightly compressed streams. Certainly for capture.

What does seem off, however, is up until the X99 chipset most boards would be highly throttling the GPU interface to attempt to keep up with this PCIe SSD. Certainly not a device to host on any of the chipset PCIe slots. Maybe this is strictly a server device, or maybe we will be seeing much more full bandwidth CPU slots in future motherboards. The DMI link between CPU and Chipset would seem to hold this device back.

Any thoughts?,28872.html


GeeBax wrote on 4/9/2015, 1:05 AM
Maybe if you can afford to burn precious PCIE lanes, but many users prefer to use them for GPUs.
videoITguy wrote on 4/9/2015, 4:27 PM
This issue is not exactly news...there have been similar PciE lane burner devices out for several years. The trick is to mate it into a motherboard chipset equip that is going to handle your overall configuration. I have been successful in doing it with special MB's but then again I could care less about supporting any GPU anywhere in my hardware.
GeeBax wrote on 4/9/2015, 5:23 PM
[I] but then again I could care less about supporting any GPU anywhere in my hardware.[/I]

That's fine if all you want to run is Vegas, but if you use Resolve, then a GPU is essential.
Hulk wrote on 4/9/2015, 7:53 PM
I know there are some here who disagree with me on this but there are very few Vegas projects that will be able to saturate the 500MB/sec transfer rate of a single quality SSD. I wouldn't worry too much about sequential transfer rates and the limitations of SATA3.
OldSmoke wrote on 4/9/2015, 8:06 PM
The problem really are the limited amount of PCIe lanes available in today's systems topping out at 40 lanes for the socket 2011 and 2011v3.

Proud owner of Sony Vegas Pro 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 & 13 and now Magix VP15&16.

System Spec.:
Motherboard: ASUS X299 Prime-A

Ram: G.Skill 4x8GB DDR4 2666 XMP

CPU: i7-9800x @ 4.6GHz (custom water cooling system)
GPU: 1x AMD Vega Pro Frontier Edition (water cooled)
Hard drives: System Samsung 970Pro NVME, AV-Projects 1TB (4x Intel P7600 512GB VROC), 4x 2.5" Hotswap bays, 1x 3.5" Hotswap Bay, 1x LG BluRay Burner

PSU: Corsair 1200W
Monitor: 2x Dell Ultrasharp U2713HM (2560x1440)

john_dennis wrote on 4/9/2015, 10:54 PM
"[I]...there are very few Vegas projects that will be able to saturate the 500Mb/sec transfer rate...[/I]"

That's a big B. SATA 3 = 6Gbit/sec. or 600MB/sec.

My main system:
Motherboard: Asus X99-AII
CPU: Intel i7-6850K
GPU: Sapphire Radeon RX480-8GB
RAM: Corsair Dominator (4 x 4 GB) DDR4 2400
Disk O/S & Programs: Intel SSD 750 (400 GB)
Disk Active Projects: 1TB & 2TB WD BLACK SN750 NVMe Internal PCI Express 3.0 x4 Solid State Drives
Disk Other: WD Ultrastar/Hitachi Hard Drives: WDBBUR0080BNC-WRSN, HGST HUH728080ALE600, 724040ALE640, HDS3020BLA642
Case: LIAN LI PC-90 Black Aluminum ATX Full Tower Case
CPU cooling: Corsair Hydro series H115i
Power supply: SeaSonic SS-750KM3 750W 80 PLUS GOLD Certified Full Modular Active PFC Power Supply
Drive Bay: Kingwin KF-256-BK 2.5" and 3.5" Trayless Hot Swap Rack with USB 3
Sound card: Crystal Sound 3 on motherboard. Recording done on another system.
Primary Monitor: Asus ProArt PA248q (24" 1920 x 1200)
O/S: Windows 10 Pro 22H2, Build 19045.2130

Camera: Sony RX10 Model IV

Hulk wrote on 4/10/2015, 6:27 AM
I was referring to the "real world" ~500MB/sec SATA3 transfer rates.

And yes, that IS a big "B" as in byte and not bit!

astar wrote on 4/10/2015, 9:20 PM
I agree on the SATA3 opinion. I look at these devices as a road map for future products coming down the road. If you envision a 4k world editing world, 4k uncompressed or even light compression, with multiple streams will exceed SATA3 quickly. 4K-8-bit@100Mbs is a highly compressed image. Try the math on 4K-10-bit @ 60fps and then quarter that, and then double or triple for stream composites.

After looking at this further the X99 is apparently built ready for this device, due to the DMI2.0x4 bridge. That would allow placing the SSD on the chipset lanes.
wilvan wrote on 4/11/2015, 1:39 AM
Gonna order 2 of those for one of the Z820's , defintely worth it and the way to go for 4k and higher.

Sony  PXW-FS7K and 2 x Sony PXW-Z280  ( optimised as per Doug Jensen Master Classes and Alister Chapman advices )
2 x HP Z840 workstations , each as follows : WIN10 pro x 64 , 2 x 10 core Xeon E5-2687W V3 at 3.5 GHz , 256 GB reg ECC RAM , HP nvidia quadro RTX A5000 , 3 x samsung 970 EVO Plus 1TB M.2 2280 PCIe 3.0 x4  , 3 x SSD 1TB samsung 860 pro , 3 x 3TB WD3003FZEX.
SONY Vegas Pro 13 build 453  ( user since version 4 ) , SONY DVDarch , SONY SoundForge(s) , SONY Acid Pro(s) , SONY Cinescore ( each year buying upgrades for all of them since vegas pro 4 )
(MAGIX) Vegas pro 14 ( bought it as a kind of support but never installed it )
Adobe Photoshop  CC 2018
Adobe After Effects CC 2018 & Adobe Media Encoder CC 2018
Avid Media Composer 2022.xx ( started with the FREE Avid Media Composer First in 2019 )
Dedicated solely editing systems , fully optimized , windows 10 pro x 64 
( win10 pro operating systems , all most silly garbage and kid's stuff of microsoft entirely removed , never update win 10 unless required for editing purposes or ( maybe ) after a while when updates have proven to be reliable and no needless microsoft kid's stuff is added in the updates )