Preview while Scrubbing/Playback Performance

Joshua-Polloni wrote on 5/21/2022, 10:26 AM

I have been using Vegas Pro 13.0 for a long time. I recently tried Premiere Pro and Vegas 19 since I upgraded my PC several months ago. I'm running i5-11600k, 3080TI, 32GB of memory, and NVMe M.2 Drives.

Vegas 13 was great and I am used to the controls. I was mainly interested in the render times working on 3840x2160 60fps material.

While I find premiere to run a bit faster overall, I didn't like the pricing and I don't know the controls as well. I chose to go with Vegas Pro 19 license. It rendered a project in about a minute compared to 7 minutes with Vegas Pro 13.

I am not using it in projects and the preview and scrubbing is just awful in 19. I am using video proxies for all files, I have the preview set to Preview Auto, and I have maxed out the dynamic RAM preview at 24475MB. It is still very laggy.

I open the same files in Vegas 13 and it is much smoother. There might be a touch of lag when clicking play but then it's gone.

Do I need to change some more settings? I am worried I won't receive a refund if I try to request one. After seeing the rendering time and having a good experience with 13 I just assumed 19 would handle the same or better than 13. Guess it's my bad for assuming.

 

Comments

Former user wrote on 5/21/2022, 6:31 PM

I have been using Vegas Pro 13.0 for a long time. I recently tried Premiere Pro and Vegas 19 since I upgraded my PC several months ago. I'm running i5-11600k, 3080TI, 32GB of memory, and NVMe M.2 Drives.


I open the same files in Vegas 13 and it is much smoother. There might be a touch of lag when clicking play but then it's gone.

Do I need to change some more settings? I am worried I won't receive a refund if I try to request one. After seeing the rendering time and having a good experience with 13 I just assumed 19 would handle the same or better than 13. Guess it's my bad for assuming.

 

 

If you go to options/prefs/FileIO , change decoder settings to Legacy AVC/ restart, will Vegas operate more like VP13 as far as smoothness with the same file?

Change dynamic range back to 5-10%. Comparing VP19 to VP13 seems like a good place to start, you want to at least get the same file to play the same, and not worse.

Joshua-Polloni wrote on 5/21/2022, 7:12 PM

If you go to options/prefs/FileIO , change decoder settings to Legacy AVC/ restart, will Vegas operate more like VP13 as far as smoothness with the same file?

Change dynamic range back to 5-10%. Comparing VP19 to VP13 seems like a good place to start, you want to at least get the same file to play the same, and not worse.

This made a huge difference. This seems to be on par with Pro 13. I will do some more reading up on dynamic preview. It seems more may not be better in this case (75%). I see you were involved in this thread too: https://www.vegascreativesoftware.info/us/forum/the-truth-about-the-dynamic-ram-preview-max-setting--132191/

I sometimes use the ram render when previewing transitions and the like.

Thank you for your reply, Todd.

This is my first experience working with UHD footage. I expect it to be a bit of a load on the system compared to HD.

Former user wrote on 5/21/2022, 7:38 PM

At 4K if you are using ram previews you'll want to turn it up, but the high figures don't help normal playback 1000 or even 200 is just as good for that. Problem if you use Legacy decoder you not have GPU decoding, which you may need with some of your 4K content, and there's also media that won't play without using default decoder (SO4)

The 75% figure is not so good, because you have a good processor and GPU, and they build on the old sony vegas, you would expect processing requirements to go up, but the hope would be with enough processing power it would playback just as well

Joshua-Polloni wrote on 5/22/2022, 10:31 AM

 Hi, can you share some of your footages by Google Drive, so that Vegas Team might research it and improve the new decoder?

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ukXeLcSjOmG2Dh5nIqQgcJJryeRpPv9S/view?usp=sharing

3POINT wrote on 5/22/2022, 10:45 AM

 


I sometimes use the ram render when previewing transitions and the like.
 

Instead of RAM preview use the updated prerender option of VP19. No need to preserve RAM and almost as quick, also prerender files remain as long as needed.

Former user wrote on 5/22/2022, 7:31 PM

 Hi, can you share some of your footages by Google Drive, so that Vegas Team might research it and improve the new decoder?

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ukXeLcSjOmG2Dh5nIqQgcJJryeRpPv9S/view?usp=sharing

I cut small slithers out of the file to prevent ram caching. Then played back in Resolve and Vegas, Resolve no problem, Vegas not good, playing without cuts in Vegas seems to be on verge of wanting to drop frames.

I"M an amateur at looking at files and understanding how complex and computational heavy they are, but in the absence of an expert.... The file structure looks unremarkable

compared to a high quality encode of same file will require more processing to read

 

Former user wrote on 5/22/2022, 10:05 PM

Something else to consider. What sort of AVC does Vegas actually like. I recall a disagreement between @Musicvid and @RogerS, it involved a similar situation a 4K AVC that edited poorly in Vegas with default decoder. Roger recommending lower GOP values for a re-encode such as 60, MusicVid aggressively disagreed, said he didn't know what he was talking about, and Vegas has no problem playing back GOP 250 and higher

So I encoded a file using default AVC values with GOP 250, then changed GOP to 60 and removed B frames, brought both files back onto timeline, this is the result. I tried removing B frames keeping GOP at 250 but remained laggy.

Clearly @RogerS was correct but due to the belittlement he received that day I've never heard him repeat that correct information again. @Musicvid try and control your toxicity towards people over disagreements, it makes people less likely to want to help and there's always the chance you're not right.

 

RogerS wrote on 5/23/2022, 4:05 AM

I have repeated that elsewhere as I was satisfied it was correct info. I tested just the GOP leaving other settings fixed. I didn't bother repeat the assertion in that thread as the person I am trying to assist is not the other commenter, so there's no point in having an argument. That higher GOP values (>350 IIRC) triggered the efficient editing warning in Vegas was another clue as to the origin of problems in Vegas, as were developer explanations about hitting plugin cache limits.

Thank you Todd for contributing to a community of shared learning, as we all have limits to our knowledge.