jeremyk wrote on 5/16/2015, 1:08 PM
Singular. Pretty sure about that.

Former user wrote on 5/16/2015, 1:10 PM
I'd go with "The net loss from the two-step conversion was 4%."
john_dennis wrote on 5/16/2015, 1:10 PM
Singular. There was only one conversion which contained two steps.
larry-peter wrote on 5/16/2015, 1:28 PM
I would go with singular, but the verbal reference is to "loss", not "conversion". If the sentence is in context of referring to multiple losses from a single conversion, then it would be plural. If during the conversion 12 widgets were lost, then I would use singular. If 12 widgets were lost, plus a loss of time, plus a loss of money, it could be correct to use plural.
john_dennis wrote on 5/16/2015, 1:45 PM
@ atom12

You are correct about the reference to loss and not conversion.

Yesterday, I did a search for "Auto Exposure Lock" thinking I had found the killer technique. Then, remembered that I use it almost every day. Some day soon they're going to lower me over the side.

I've only had two cups of coffee this morning. Going to get more.
Tim L wrote on 5/16/2015, 1:50 PM
I agree that the reference is to "net loss", not conversion. I think singular because "net" refers to a single loss measurement -- the difference from starting condition to ending condition -- even if that entails multiple step losses in between.

It would still be singular even if you referred to multiple conversions: "the net loss after 15 conversions was 7%"

(But I'm a software guy, not a grammar dude... And I panic a little bit even posting this, fearful of the grammar offences this post itself might contain. Like starting a sentence with "And". And apparently it can be spelled "offences" or "offenses", and I'm not sure which of the two is proper for American English...)
musicvid10 wrote on 5/16/2015, 4:11 PM
Yes, we are agreed that the subject "loss(es)" sets the plurality for the rest of the simple sentence.

The question is whether the adjective "net" determines whether the subject noun "loss(es)" is singular or plural. The adjective " net" conveys the idea of one descriptor for a number of things ("steps").

What about "The net losses from the rwo-step conversion were 4%."
amendegw wrote on 5/16/2015, 4:59 PM
I think either is okay. See: Loss vs Losses


System Model: Alienware Area-51m R2
System: Windows 11 Home
Processor: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-10700K CPU @ 3.80GHz, 3792 Mhz, 8 Core(s), 16 Logical Processor(s)
Installed Memory: 64.0 GB
Display Adapter: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super (8GB), Nvidia Studio Driver 527.56 Dec 2022)
Overclock Off

Display: 1920x1080 144 hertz
Storage (12TB Total):
OS Drive: PM981a NVMe SAMSUNG 2048GB
Data Drive1: Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 2TB
Data Drive2: Samsung SSD 870 QVO 8TB

USB: Thunderbolt 3 (USB Type-C) port Supports USB 3.2 Gen 2, DisplayPort 1.2, Thunderbolt 3

Canon R5
Canon R3
Sony A9

larry-peter wrote on 5/16/2015, 5:47 PM
"net" is "remaining after the deduction of all charges, outlay, or loss" so I still think it depends how the sentence fits in context with surrounding sentences. If different types or quantities of losses occur, it would make sense to have it plural. If the losses fall under one description, make it singular.
johnmeyer wrote on 5/16/2015, 5:57 PM
This takes me back to 7th grade (early 1960s) and diagramming sentences.

Both sentences are grammatically correct, at least as far as subject/predicate noun/verb agreement: "loss" is singular and requires the verb "were," and "losses" is plural and requires the verb All other parts of the sentence are qualifiers and can be ignored.

"Net" has nothing to do with anything because adjectives don't affect (not "effect") the noun/verb agreement.

Finally, if you are concerned about whether "net loss" or "net losses" is correct, that is not a grammar question but instead depends on what you are trying to say. If you are describing the sum of all losses of a single type (like a profit/loss statement), then it would be "net loss." If you are describing multiple independent losses, then "net losses" might be more appropriate.

Most situations would probably be better covered by using "net loss."

[edit]Atom12 posted while I was writing, and I agree with his "loss" vs. "losses" statement.
riredale wrote on 5/16/2015, 6:24 PM
Okay, here's a structure I've seen that drives me nuts--thinking of an organization as a plural.

"Sony are taking steps to increase profits."
"Sony is taking steps to increase profits."
musicvid10 wrote on 5/16/2015, 6:28 PM
Sony need to take steps to increase profit!
JJKizak wrote on 5/16/2015, 6:49 PM
"Sony need" or "Sony needs".
Chienworks wrote on 5/16/2015, 7:34 PM
Y'all are wrong! ;)

Either one is correct, in it's appropriate context. If there was one loss then the first one is correct. If there were more than one loss then the second one is correct. The verb has to match the subject, but the subject is defined by the situation, not by the sentence that contains it.
PeterWright wrote on 5/16/2015, 7:36 PM
>"Sony are taking steps to increase profits."
"Sony is taking steps to increase profits."

Neither - it should be

"Sony are taking steps to improve Vegas Pro."
musicvid10 wrote on 5/16/2015, 8:34 PM
Did you notice the smiley at the end of my last post?

VidMus wrote on 5/16/2015, 9:37 PM
You are asking a grammar question on the internet?

ushere wrote on 5/16/2015, 10:02 PM
prefer pumpkin pie...
mdindestin wrote on 5/16/2015, 10:19 PM
The data are good.
JJKizak wrote on 5/17/2015, 6:54 AM
Yes, I was just trying to be funny.
musicvid10 wrote on 5/17/2015, 7:51 AM
Well, if you was trying to be funny, so were I.
Dexcon wrote on 5/17/2015, 7:58 AM
@ riredale

Re: 'Sony are' and 'Sony is', I believe that either is correct depending on the intent of the writer.

I recall from an advanced English language course I did some 30 years ago (not at a Uni but at a similar to Uni level) where there was an exploration about the times when a singular or plural verb could be used after a collective subject. For example, 'The audience is clapping ...' or 'The audience are clapping ...'. It depends on whether the writer's intent relates to the subject being a collective as a whole (i.e. Sony as an organisation; or the audience as a collective of the group of people) - then the singular verb can be used.

But if the subject represents the units of the collective (i.e. all the individuals that make up the management and/or staff of Sony; or all the individual persons that make up the audience), then the plural verb can be used.

My pet hate: the use of 'less' when 'fewer' should used. Less relates to quantity, but fewer relates to numbers. While we may hear "There were less emails today than yesterday", at least we don't hear "There is fewer flour in this pack than the other pack".

Cameras: Sony FDR-AX100E; GoPro Hero 11 Black Creator Edition

Installed: Vegas Pro 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 & 21, HitFilm Pro 2021.3, DaVinci Resolve Studio 18.5, BCC 2023.5, Mocha Pro 2023, Ignite Pro, NBFX TotalFX 7, Neat NR, DVD Architect 6.0, MAGIX Travel Maps, Sound Forge Pro 16, SpectraLayers Pro 11, iZotope RX10 Advanced and many other iZ plugins, Vegasaur 4.0

Windows 11

Dell Alienware Aurora 11

10th Gen Intel i9 10900KF - 10 cores (20 threads) - 3.7 to 5.3 GHz

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER 8GB GDDR6 - liquid cooled

64GB RAM - Dual Channel HyperX FURY DDR4 XMP at 3200MHz

C drive: 12TB Samsung 990 PCIe 4.0 NVMe M.2 PCIe SSD

D: drive: 4TB Samsung 870 SATA SSD (used for media for editing current projects)

E: drive: 2TB Samsung 870 SATA SSD

F: drive: 6TB WD 7200 rpm Black HDD 3.5"

Dell Ultrasharp 32" 4K Color Calibrated Monitor

fldave wrote on 5/17/2015, 10:57 AM
I'd say singular, you only have one "net loss".
riredale wrote on 5/17/2015, 11:16 AM
"The data are good." Hmmm.

If we wanted to be nitpicky, I'd have to conclude that "datum" is a single data point, while "data" is a collection. Oops, I mean "data" are a collection.

But a "data set" is a single entity. Maybe when one says "The data is good," they are assuming the reader knows the word "set" is part of the meaning.