Comments

Terje wrote on 11/12/2014, 6:18 PM
4K TVs smaller than about 70 inches make no sense.
OldSmoke wrote on 11/12/2014, 6:32 PM
I agree. 70" and up should be 4K, below HD does a very good job.

Proud owner of Sony Vegas Pro 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 & 13 and now Magix VP15&16.

System Spec.:
Motherboard: ASUS X299 Prime-A

Ram: G.Skill 4x8GB DDR4 2666 XMP

CPU: i7-9800x @ 4.6GHz (custom water cooling system)
GPU: 1x AMD Vega Pro Frontier Edition (water cooled)
Hard drives: System Samsung 970Pro NVME, AV-Projects 1TB (4x Intel P7600 512GB VROC), 4x 2.5" Hotswap bays, 1x 3.5" Hotswap Bay, 1x LG BluRay Burner

PSU: Corsair 1200W
Monitor: 2x Dell Ultrasharp U2713HM (2560x1440)

john_dennis wrote on 11/12/2014, 6:40 PM
"4K TVs smaller than about 70 inches make no sense."

I tend to agree with that statement except in limited situations.

1) Displaying stills from the local USB port. (My stills are 4000x3000 or 4000x2248.) I've cropped them to 3840x2160 and they look very good.

2) Displaying a laptop screen to the 4K panel for all the family to see.

Disclaimers:

I own a 49" Sony XBR-49X850B.

We sit about 9-1/5 feet from the screen. A 70" screen at any resolution would not be good for us.

Very little that I do makes any sense, economically, technically or philosophically.
RalphM wrote on 11/12/2014, 7:08 PM
LOL John,

I'll add a corollary:

All the technology I buy is now smarter than I am!