The post "Why Vegas" has prompted me to wonder who else is using VV3 mainly for multitrack audio recording and mixing? Those who do may agree that "Vegas Video" is a misleading name. The only reason I upgraded to VV3 is because Vegas Audio was discontinued. I believe SF may be passing up a lot of potential customers because they see the word "video" and don't realize VV3 is as great for audio as it is for video--that its audio capabilities rival or surpass that of other audio recording/mixing/editing software. I guess I just feel the software should be renamed to something that points to its audio capabilities as well...and maybe my clients wouldn't be raising an eyebrow when they see me opening a video-editing program to mix their music. Just a thought.
VV3 should be renamed
Back to post