Everything is progressive, downscaled 1080p->480p lossless. No sharpening has been applied.
I mentioned in an earlier thread that if I was concerned about moire I might consider Lanczos. That should help one decide which is which.
Craftech's expression was "far greater". That seems an overstatement for farss's explanation. Averaging two lines will reduce the noise POWER by one half or 3 dB. One stop is a doubling of the light AMPLITUDE or quadrupling the light POWER (6 dB). So line averaging improves noise by half of a stop. Nice to have but not mind blowing.
Thanks anyway for the explanation.
But when you look at it, you are trading resolution for noise.This can be done on the progressive frame in post, so you have gained nothing really.
The sequence should be for interlaced HD to interlaced SD:
Interesting. I've been doing all mine wrong then:
Deinterlace to twice frame rate (eg 50i to 50p)
Reduce resolution (HD to SD)
Low pass filter
Sharpen and add salt to taste
Re-interlace by discarding unwanted lines (eg 50p to 50i)
Anyone got a really bad HD moire-twitter-inducing clip to run some tests on?
Peter said: Craftech's expression was "far greater". That seems an overstatement for farss's explanation. Averaging two lines will reduce the noise POWER by one half or 3 dB. One stop is a doubling of the light AMPLITUDE or quadrupling the light POWER (6 dB). So line averaging improves noise by half of a stop. Nice to have but not mind blowing.
It's more than that. Take Adam Wilt's original review of the Sony PMW-EX1
Sensitivity
When shooting stage productions every bit of extra light gathering ability makes a difference.