Comments

raul-c wrote on 10/10/2020, 6:51 AM

BRAW is an open source codec. Any camera manufacturer or recorder can implement it into their hardware if they like. If has proven itself to be one of the most efficient codecs. It handles 4k, 6k, 8k, and 12k. What other codec on the market has that capability. Besides the codec lets not ignore the poor performance that vegas has regarding gpu performance. Davinci implements its gpu performance 2nd to none. Even if I did use prores it works smoother on davinci vs Vegas because davinci has mastered gpu acceleration. Vegas is so far behind the curve in its codec support and gpu acceleration capabilities.

This is absolutely true. I have been blown away by Resolve's performance, even with my laptop which only has a GeForce 1050ti.

andyrpsmith wrote on 10/10/2020, 7:45 AM

Nice comparison of Vegas & Resolve

(Intel 3rd gen i5@4.1GHz, 32GB RAM, SSD, 1080Ti GPU, Windows 10) Not now used with Vegas.

13th gen i913900K - water cooled, 96GB RAM, 4TB M2 drive, 4TB games SSD, 2TB video SSD, GPU RTX 4080 Super, Windows 11 pro

fr0sty wrote on 10/10/2020, 1:21 PM

This is absolutely true. I have been blown away by Resolve's performance, even with my laptop which only has a GeForce 1050ti.

I had the opposite experience, I kept running into brick walls where it would say my GPU wasn't sufficient for tasks as simple as noise reduction (which VEGAS does just fine on pretty much any supported hardware), and it crashed on me multiple times. I did love its motion tracking system, though.

Systems:

Desktop

AMD Ryzen 7 1800x 8 core 16 thread at stock speed

64GB 3000mhz DDR4

Geforce RTX 3090

Windows 10

Laptop:

ASUS Zenbook Pro Duo 32GB (9980HK CPU, RTX 2060 GPU, dual 4K touch screens, main one OLED HDR)

alifftudm95 wrote on 10/10/2020, 1:37 PM

BRAW is an open source codec. Any camera manufacturer or recorder can implement it into their hardware if they like. If has proven itself to be one of the most efficient codecs. It handles 4k, 6k, 8k, and 12k. What other codec on the market has that capability. Besides the codec lets not ignore the poor performance that vegas has regarding gpu performance. Davinci implements its gpu performance 2nd to none. Even if I did use prores it works smoother on davinci vs Vegas because davinci has mastered gpu acceleration. Vegas is so far behind the curve in its codec support and gpu acceleration capabilities.

This is absolutely true. I have been blown away by Resolve's performance, even with my laptop which only has a GeForce 1050ti.

Tried to use & learn resolve, bit hard at first but pretty easy actually, just that some simple edits required more clicks then VEGAS & PP.

Resolve Color science is just crazy, so natural. And the playback is rock solid, no crash & everything is running smooth.

Editor and Colorist (Kinda) from Malaysia

MYPOST Member

Laptop

MacBook Pro M4 Max

16 Core CPU and 40 Core GPU

64GB Memory

2TB Internal SSD Storage

Anti-Glare 4K HDR Screen

 

PC DEKSTOP

CPU: Ryzen 9 5900x

GPU: RTX3090 24GB

RAM: 64GB 3200MHZ

MOBO: X570-E

Storage:

C DRIVE NVME M.2 1TB SSD GEN 4

D DRIVE NVME M.2 2TB SSD GEN 4

E DRIVE SATA SSD 2TB

F DRIVE SATA SSD 2TB

G DRIVE HDD 1TB

Monitor: Asus ProArt PA279CV 4K HDR (Bought on 30 August 2023)

Monitor: BenQ PD2700U 4K HDR (RIP on 30 August 2023)

 

 

 

Former user wrote on 10/10/2020, 8:14 PM

I, like many people, have a PTSD type fear of Vegas crashing & losing work, because it crashes so often, and I was using Resolve yesterday because vegas wouldn't load the video files and I realised after 30minutes of problem free work I did not have this constant fear. I don't know resolve well enough to use it effortlessly and efficiently though

Leszek wrote on 10/16/2020, 2:41 PM

I'm here for the first time so maybe I won't get the question?

I have two cameras selected for purchase.
Sony RX10 IV and Blackmagic Pocket Cinema Camera 4K.

I have a Sony Vegas Pro Suite 18, which I have already gotten to know a bit (from version 13).

Question:
Which camera should I choose (it is quite a big expense for me)?
First, I liked Sony, also because of its universality, because of the slow-motion - but recently I read about Blackmagic (I also got to know the free version of Resolve a bit) and the enthusiastic reviews of Camera 4K.
However, will I use the Blackmagic Pocket Cinema Camera 4K in the Sony Vegas Pro 18? (I have already read about incompatible formats)

I am asking for honest advice and the easiest way possible, because I am not a professional!

JN- wrote on 10/16/2020, 2:44 PM

@Leszek The Sonys xavc-s codec will save you a lot of headaches. Best approach would be to get sample footage from both cameras and see how it goes.

Last changed by JN- on 10/16/2020, 2:47 PM, changed a total of 1 times.

---------------------------------------------

VFR2CFR, Variable frame rate to Constant frame rate link to zip here.

Copies Video Converts Audio to AAC, link to zip here.

Convert 2 Lossless, link to ZIP here.

Convert Odd 2 Even (frame size), link to ZIP here

Benchmarking Continued thread + link to zip here

Codec Render Quality tables zip

---------------------------------------------

PC ... Corsair case, own build ...

CPU .. i9 9900K, iGpu UHD 630

Memory .. 32GB DDR4

Graphics card .. MSI RTX 2080 ti

Graphics driver .. latest studio

PSU .. Corsair 850i

Mboard .. Asus Z390 Code

 

Laptop… XMG

i9-11900k, iGpu n/a

Memory 64GB DDR4

Graphics card … Laptop RTX 3080

Leszek wrote on 10/16/2020, 2:47 PM

@Leszek  Sonys xavc-s pozwolił Ci zaoszczędzić wiele problemów.

I know - it's a big plus.
However, I am still analyzing + and - of both cameras.

Rainer wrote on 10/16/2020, 5:41 PM

Probably in the wrong thread, but..

You will get much more use out of the RX10IV. You benefit from the IS, better autofocus and weather sealing and a great lens at no extra cost. Also, you don't need to add lenses, a gimbal, an EVF/monitor for starters, plus nowadays with wireless who needs XLR. Also consider the Panasonic FZ2500, not weather sealed, not as good autofocus, less reach on slightly slower lens (but despite what you may have read just as sharp) - cheaper, with quite a few additional video features (DCI, ND filters) over the Sony. The BMPCC4K is a truly great budget cinema camera, but that's what it is. If only filmmaking is your aim, think about paying the extra for the BM6K, by the time you add a speedbooster adapter to the 4K so you can use EF lenses the cost isn't that much different.

RogerS wrote on 10/16/2020, 10:10 PM

Only you know your needs, but these cameras are very different from each other.

BM requires a viewfinder, batteries, interchangeable lenses, has no autofocus, but very high quality recording codecs. Are you shooting narrative short films? If so it's probably a better option. Some formats won't work in Vegas but it comes with Resolve. The Sony is a convenient camera with built-in zoom lens that only shoots various types of AVC. You might look at the Panasonic GH5 as more competition with the Blackmagic but a little easier to deal with (better battery, viewfinder, stabilization).

Jeff.J wrote on 6/9/2021, 3:00 PM

Here is a comparison of BRAW vs. ProRes RAW recorded from a Panasonic S1H.

Steve_Rhoden wrote on 6/9/2021, 5:26 PM

Trust me, go with the Sony RX10 IV....