Noticed someone's comment dated 15 Nov 2021.

So I guess this is originally old article, while being updated to recent April 17 2023.

It looks to be a review of Vegas Pro 20.

From the article:

Until now, Vegas Pro had been held back by overwhelming interface complexity, so only serious pros needed apply.

Huh? There's not too much difference in Vegas Pro's GUI layout since Vegas Pro 10 (my entry VP version) other than now having a display choice other than 'light'. The reviewer provided no opinion as to what the older version complexity was as against VP20. It almost seems that the reviewer is comparing VP20 to some other NLE from years ago that he has confused as being Vegas Pro.

What is immediately apparent is that the reviewer has failed to do what a good reviewer should do and that is to provide details and explanations about the condensed pros/cons points. As far as I could see, there's nothing in the review pointing out the interface conveniences found in other NLEs that are lacking in VP; no mention about the internet security issue; and a failure to recognise that VP tutorials are accessible by another means (Hub) than the method used in some other NLES - so a big "so what" to that point - it's just different, that's all. The reviewer seems to assume that all NLEs must do everything the same way.

Overall, this was an incredibly sloppy and poorly written review which does the reviewer no credit.

I would love to see Videostudio Pro or Powerdirector do what Vegas can do, with the say, BRAW. Reading the replies shows that the simplest of things, the reviewer didn't have a grasp of. And if you read any past reviews, PD and VS are always highly regarded.... hmmm.....

To fully understand any complex software, you have to spend a lot of time with it, and constantly use it. These "reviewers" are under a deadline. And like all of us, we have our personal preferences. Some prefer the upside down editing of Powerdirector of Videostudio Pro... not me though.

"To fully understand any complex software, you have to spend a lot of time with it, and constantly use it."

You are correct with this... so lately, there are "My reviews of 'product' after a year / some months"

The Vegas review reads like that of an air-head. In sharp contrast to the same person's review of DaVinci Resolve. He's the head of PC Mag's review department so obviously he's more sophisticated than he made himself out to be. His motivation is anyone's guess but my impression is that the Vegas review is a calculated hit-piece.

Davinci is a 4, Adobe is a 4, Filmora is a 4... but Power Director is a 5? 😉😄

Another inaccurate statement in the PC Mag review: "originally developed by Sony"

Vegas was originally developed by Sonic Foundry as an audio only DAW). Video was added prior to Sony's acquisition as well.

Just as an excercise, without a lot of informative input, I asked Chatgpt to write pro vs con review of VEGAS PRO. The reviewer would've faired better in plagirizing it.



 

VEGAS PRO is a popular video editing software, and like any tool, it has its pros and cons. Let's explore both sides to provide a comprehensive overview.

Pros of Vegas Pro

1. **User-Friendly Interface:** Vegas Pro is known for its intuitive and easy-to-navigate interface. This makes it accessible for beginners while still offering powerful tools for advanced users.

2. **Robust Editing Features:** The software provides a wide range of editing tools, including advanced color grading, compositing, and audio editing capabilities. This allows for high-level professional editing.

3. **Flexible Workflow:** Vegas Pro supports a flexible workflow, allowing editors to customize their workspace and adapt the software to their specific editing needs and styles.

4. **Strong Community and Support:** There is a large community of Vegas Pro users, providing a wealth of tutorials, tips, and plugins. Additionally, the software has good customer support for troubleshooting and advice.

5. **Cost-Effective:** Compared to some other professional editing software, Vegas Pro is relatively affordable, offering a good balance between features and price.

### Cons of Vegas Pro

1. **Performance Issues:** Some users have reported performance issues with Vegas Pro, especially when working with very high-resolution footage or complex projects.

2. **Compatibility Limitations:** While Vegas Pro supports many formats, there can be compatibility issues with certain file types or codecs, potentially requiring additional conversion software.

3. **Steep Learning Curve for Advanced Features:** Although the basic interface is user-friendly, mastering the more advanced features of Vegas Pro can take time and may be overwhelming for beginners.

4. **Lack of Certain Advanced Features:** While Vegas Pro is powerful, it may lack some of the high-end features found in other professional software, like sophisticated motion tracking or 360-degree editing tools.

5. **Occasional Stability Issues:** Some users have experienced crashes or stability issues, particularly during longer editing sessions or when using numerous effects and transitions.

In conclusion, Vegas Pro is a strong contender in the realm of video editing software, particularly for those seeking a balance between advanced capabilities and user-friendliness. However, potential users should consider their specific needs and possibly trial the software before committing, to ensure it meets their requirements in terms of performance, features, and stability.

@VEGASPascal, PD is often rated as their #1, with Videostudio Pro #2. With statements like this: "For more modern and complete tools, look to our enthusiast-level Editors’ Choice video editing software picks, Corel VideoStudio and CyberLink PowerDirector." You can see why I would think all their reviews would be suspect, and wonder about "payola".

There is nothing wrong with using a consumer editor or even recommending it. But reading that "review" shows a total lack of knowing not much about the software. Notice no acknowledgement of the replies correcting the inaccuracies....

@VEGASPascal, PD is often rated as their #1, with Videostudio Pro #2. With statements like this: "For more modern and complete tools, look to our enthusiast-level Editors’ Choice video editing software picks, Corel VideoStudio and CyberLink PowerDirector." You can see why I would think all their reviews would be suspect, and wonder about "payola".

There is nothing wrong with using a consumer editor or even recommending it. But reading that "review" shows a total lack of knowing not much about the software. Notice no acknowledgement of the replies correcting the inaccuracies....

Agree.

I would hope anyone planning to commit to a video editor would do an evaluation of each trial version. It's exactly how I ended up with Sony Vegas 15 years ago over Corel, Adobe, and Magix (lol).

I'm longtime user of Vegas and since a few years also of Powerdirector and Resolve. My opinion: Unfortunately there^s no ideal editor so I combine their pros to eliminate their cons.

If I really had to choose to use only one of them, I probably would choose.....

Sadly, people look for confirmation bias in just about everything. I had PD many years ago because it could do multicam editing. I tried a few of it's features, they were nice, but for me, nothing special. I can't comment on it today though. I've owned Resolve Studio for several years now. It was a gift from my wife. I've yet to edit a single video in it.

If it weren't for a Humble Bundle on VP14 Edit, I doubt if I would be here today. I agree with @3POINT, there is no perfect editor yet, at least what I am looking for. So do have several different ones installed on my computer. Each has something they excel in that the others do not. It's a video editing tool chest. Use the right tool for the job at hand.

https://www.g2.com/compare/adobe-premiere-pro-vs-powerdirector-vs-davinci-resolve-vs-vegas-pro

I tried a lot of different editing solutions before I ended up with Vegas Post. Windows Movie Maker in the 90's, Ulead back in the early 00's, Pinnacle until 2015, and Power Director until 2022. Each had their limitations. Pinnacle crashed a lot, didn't render cleanly, and started having plugin problems. I loved PD, but they suddenly ended their partnership with NewBlueFX and made plugins I paid for outside of their program stop functioning. I tried Davinici, but it was too hefty for my laptop during trips. So, Vegas.

Vegas just works (with the exception of the current red/blue swap on my AMD laptop). The interface took me a week to figure out enough to do more advanced edits, and I adore Vegas Effects, and actually had to pull out Vegas Image for a photo gig that Photoshop was going too slow on. I haven't had a lot of crashes or anything, and that's running on a 4 year old desktop that I really need to upgrade or replace.

So, yeah. That review is biased.

@Elynde the "red/blue" issue is only with Vegas Effects now. My understanding is that the info was passed along. It's only with the AMD graphics. But if you go back to 23.7.2, that issue will not be there.

But your experience reflected mine. After 2 weeks of using the Humble Bundle VP14 Edit, I updated to VP15 Suite. VP21 has had a few "hiccups" every now and then, but the way I edit and with my source material, Vegas, "just works"...

Unfortunately, that reviewer has never liked VEGAS. I've talked to him and given demos, but he still holds his negative opinion. We'll just keep working to get better.

@gary-rebholz no accounting for his personal tastes in editing software. His bias is well known to anyone who has read his previous reviews.

leave that guy then.

Although his review is long and goes somewhat deep, it is obvious he carries a preferential disdain for Vegas Pro.

It is pointless trying to convince users such as this about any serious improvements Vegas makes, just never gonna change..... The fact that he recommends instead Corel Video Studio and Cyberlink Power Director at the end of his review, speaks for itself !