Adobe pro finally kill all those footage….it Vegas pro issues and Vegas do a lot of lagging and playtime ..thanks for everyone now I switch to premiere pro
Former user
wrote on 2/19/2022, 12:02 AM
You never bothered uploading a small sample file to a file host as requested, you'll never know if it was just you that couldn't play back the file.
I got a Sony A7SIII nearly 12 months ago and when I got it I tried to stretch its legs and went and filmed a band one night...I Filmed it all in 10bit 4k, mostly using Slog 3, some in S Cinetone. I even shot a portion of it at 100fps to get some good slow mo. I have found that I am not having problems with playback in "normal" frame rates and have not had to use proxies yet but the 100fps stutters from time to time. When I load that 100fps into Premiere it plays completely smoothly, but I would prefer to work in Vegas for most of my editing.
I have tried disabling GPU assistance etc but this doesn't seem to make a whole lot of difference.
I don't know if this will be the same for everyone with the problems with just the higher frame rates as I have a pretty beefy setup.
For decoding the CPU isn't so important it's the GPU.
a7SIII footage mostly plays back very well with Intel GPUs/iGPUs- except for HEVC 4:2:2 I don't see any need for proxies with my desktop (see signature). There's plenty of sample media you can try with your 11th gen Intel.
For decoding the CPU isn't so important it's the GPU.
a7SIII footage mostly plays back very well with Intel GPUs/iGPUs- except for HEVC 4:2:2 I don't see any need for proxies with my desktop (see signature). There's plenty of sample media you can try with your 11th gen Intel.
@RogerS .. Thanks Roger. This encourages me to take the plunge on the A7iv .. I principally make short films, doing little with stills .. so it might even be the FX3 .. but likely the A7iv to start my journey into full frame camera-land.
Both should be great cameras- I've been shooting side by side with a filmmaker who "downgraded" from a larger cinema cam and got a FX3 recently. A7iv would be good if you also do photography.
There are a lot of choices for file formats from these newer Sonys so I'd do some workflow testing with your system and VEGAS and find a combination that works smoothly for you.
There are a lot of choices for file formats from these newer Sonys so I'd do some workflow testing with your system and VEGAS and find a combination that works smoothly for you.
That is very true. I have seen that also with my FS7 long time ago, that - for example - slog3 UHD 50p 10bit XAVC-i log footage plays back hard in Vegas, especially since I had to enable the ACES transformation to HDR10. While long-GOP 10bit footage plays back much better. Those findings are similar for both of my systems (see my signiture for the system specs).
Both should be great cameras- I've been shooting side by side with a filmmaker who "downgraded" from a larger cinema cam and got a FX3 recently. A7iv would be good if you also do photography.
There are a lot of choices for file formats from these newer Sonys so I'd do some workflow testing with your system and VEGAS and find a combination that works smoothly for you.
@RogerS Where can I find some 4K 10 bit footage to test on my system?
@RogerS .. Huge thanks Roger .. I downloaded the the first 10 bit 4:2:2 Slog-3 (MXF files) .. plays great on my system at Best Auto preview (almost full frame rate) .. I slapped a quick Slog-3 LUT onto it and it graded fairly nice in a flash with no extra effort. Nice. Very encouraging .. If I had to decide right now it would be the A7iv ... I'm starting to think the investment in the glass is going to be the big deal.
Tried the 1st one myself on my laptop w/12900h & 3060 vp20. 422 avc 10-bit 50fps mxf intra and best fps I could get w/Vegas slog3-709 built-in lut was about 8. w/o lut around 24. Ooops... just realized it's on battery.
What a difference plugged in: 35-45 fps w/lut at good-auto and 50fps w/o lut. w/Sony 4_SGamut3CineSLog3_To_Cine+709 looks much better but plays a little slower: 25-35 fps.
Also tried Aces and playback performance was about the same 25-35 fps. Looked better than the Vegas built-in lut but to my eye I liked the Sony 3D one at 32-bit full a little better.
Yes, regular ProRes works fantastic in VEGAS, to the point that I'd say using it for 10+ bit shooting is preferable to upgrading your hardware (assuming you already have a decently-modern system) when it comes to getting more performance out of VEGAS.
Yes, regular ProRes works fantastic in VEGAS, to the point that I'd say using it for 10+ bit shooting is preferable to upgrading your hardware (assuming you already have a decently-modern system) when it comes to getting more performance out of VEGAS.
@RogerS .. @fr0sty .. Thanks guys. I found a 10 bit ProRes sample and YES, it plays smoothly .. rock solid full frame rate on Best/Auto .. Thanks for clearing that up guys!
New purchase FX30. I'm transitioning from 8bit to 10bit and want to lean on you guys for some help if possible.
Just read through everyone's comments as I'm having a little playback lag with some footage taken. Its not terrible, but I'm afraid to film a full shoot and potentially struggle with the edit. Time is key for me so any support to ensure I'm set before I make the full leap would be ideal. I'm not keen on editing with DR or PP so will hopefully be able to stick with Vegas Pro.
If anyone shoots with similar settings in there latest Sony cameras and can suggest any settings for both camera and Vegas to be able to film 10bit 4k , that would be very helpful.
Up until now I have been limited to shooting 8bit 4k 25fps, and 8bit 1080p 50fps using the A73 and A6600. For my next gig at the weekend, I'm gona have to use the FX30 in 8bit as this will match my other cameras, however I really want to get away from 8bit and picture profiles and start shooting proper log footage. Next level for me.
Figured I would post this here as others with a similar question may find there way here.
General Complete name : C:\Users\K Productions\Desktop\PRIVATE\M4ROOT\CLIP\C0005.MP4 Format : XAVC Codec ID : XAVC (XAVC/mp42/iso6) File size : 961 MiB Duration : 37 s 440 ms Overall bit rate mode : Variable Overall bit rate : 215 Mb/s Frame rate : 50.000 FPS Encoded date : 2023-07-12 19:14:46 UTC Tagged date : 2023-07-12 19:14:46 UTC
Video ID : 1 Format : AVC Format/Info : Advanced Video Codec Format profile : High 4:2:2@L5.2 Format settings : CABAC / 2 Ref Frames Format settings, CABAC : Yes Format settings, Reference frames : 2 frames Codec ID : avc1 Codec ID/Info : Advanced Video Coding Duration : 37 s 440 ms Bit rate mode : Variable Bit rate : 200 Mb/s Width : 3 840 pixels Height : 2 160 pixels Display aspect ratio : 16:9 Frame rate mode : Constant Frame rate : 50.000 FPS Color space : YUV Chroma subsampling : 4:2:2 Bit depth : 10 bits Scan type : Progressive Bits/(Pixel*Frame) : 0.482 Stream size : 894 MiB (93%) Encoded date : 2023-07-12 19:14:46 UTC Tagged date : 2023-07-12 19:14:46 UTC Color range : Full Metas : 3 Codec configuration box : avcC
Audio ID : 2 Format : PCM Format settings : Big / Signed Codec ID : twos Duration : 37 s 440 ms Bit rate mode : Constant Bit rate : 1 536 kb/s Channel(s) : 2 channels Sampling rate : 48.0 kHz Bit depth : 16 bits Stream size : 6.86 MiB (1%) Encoded date : 2023-07-12 19:14:46 UTC Tagged date : 2023-07-12 19:14:46 UTC
Other ID : 3 Type : meta Format : rtmd Codec ID : rtmd Duration : 37 s 440 ms Bit rate mode : Constant Encoded date : 2023-07-12 19:14:46 UTC Tagged date : 2023-07-12 19:14:46 UTC
Former user
wrote on 7/12/2023, 7:49 PM
Maybe replace your original camera files with the sony generated proxies, edit with the sony proxies, then replace the proxies with the full quality camera files. I have heard of people using camera proxies in place of the terrible quality proxies Vegas generates, but think there are problems with that, Vegas will not show the full quality of your camera proxies.
I don't know how difficult that workflow would be though if you're using many multiple camera files. I bet there's someone with experience that can help.
What camera settings will yield media that will work well with your system is something you just need to test. My own tests are with an Intel iGPU so won't translate as your decoding is with an NVIDIA GPU.
Just use proxies, they work great, and you can easily switch between proxies and original media by changing the preview quality from preview to good or best.