Comments

Roman-Nohejl wrote on 9/15/2018, 6:29 AM

Mercalli is still much better! Video Stabilization in Vegas Pro 16 is a great disappointment.

j-v wrote on 9/15/2018, 6:44 AM

Mercalli is still much better! Video Stabilization in Vegas Pro 16 is a great disappointment.

Can you show a comparison between both?
First I thought also this but after changing a few minor settings my results were at least equal.

met vriendelijke groet
Marten

Camera : Pan X900, GoPro Hero7 Hero Black, DJI Osmo Pocket, Samsung Galaxy A8
Desktop :MB Gigabyte Z390M, W11 home version 24H2, i7 9700 4.7Ghz,16 DDR4 GB RAM, Gef. GTX 1660 Ti with driver 566.14 Studiodriver and Intel HD graphics 630 with driver 31.0.101.2130
Laptop  :Asus ROG Str G712L, W11 home version 23H2, CPU i7-10875H, 16 GB RAM, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 with Studiodriver 576.02 and Intel UHD Graphics 630 with driver 31.0.101.2130
Vegas software: VP 10 to 22 and VMS(pl) 10,12 to 17.
TV      :LG 4K 55EG960V

My slogan is: BE OR BECOME A STEM CELL DONOR!!! (because it saved my life in 2016)

 

Peter_P wrote on 9/15/2018, 9:20 AM

If you try to stabilize footage with a flat profile ( like S-Log2/3) you have to increase contrast and color before the stabilizer in the filter chain. This is not possible with the Vegas internal Media FX stabilizer, which acts as the first part of the filter chain.

Mercalli can be used an Event FX and thereby is much more flexible and leads to better results.

But work is going on to improve the new Vegas internal stabilizer. I think it is too early to judge.