Working on a skiing project recorded with different cameras over several years (!!) there are quite a few challenges in keeping the snow the same flavor of white through the scenes.
It is nothing, however, that hard work can not solve - but:
It seems to me that some Vegas Pro (using ver 20) FX's like Levels and Secondary Color Correction are "static" while i.e. White Balance is "dynamic" - meaning that a once set White Balance responds to changes made to Levels lying before White Balance in the FX sequence for that clip.
Example: A situation occours if you have i.e. the FX sequence Levels - White Balance - well set - but then, at a later review, want to adjust the brightness of the snow but not much of other things but the snow.
This can be done nicely by changing the Levels Input-or-output end - but it seems that the White Balance perceives that change and responds to it by changing the White Balance of the clip. So it seems that Levels should be after White Balance ? making me wonder if Levels should not normally be preferred before White Balance if you have a camera which needs some adjustment of Levels Input Start in order to (re-)gain some needed contrast ?
So I wonder if there is a Rule of Thumb how one should build such a FX sequence ?
Possibly the issue could also be solved by having a Levels FX both before (to remedy some low camera contrast) - but also after the White Balance in order to make it possible to make later changes without influencing the once set white balance.